This image has been approved by the previous admin (bronto) and it was no vio'd and approved in at least 5 reports in the last 3 months. It was removed with no reason given by "oliver". I told him that it was already approved, and I reploaded it. He then banned me for 24 hours and removed it again. He said the precedent has changed because this time they reverse image searched it and naked pictures came up. SO?! I'm not using those pictures. I've been using THAT one. The censored one that shows nothing.
If Google was going to take down Epic Mafia over a censored picture they would have done it in the 3 months that it's been my avatar. This is clearly an attack on me and my sexual orientation. Nobody would know these men were nude below the waist unless they reverse image searched it. And why would they do that, unless they WANTED to see them naked? You literally had to SEARCH for a way to give me a violation. oliver and gennehfarrxD should be reprimanded and my ban should be lifted, as well as my violation. This is a clear abuse of power and it's a personal attack against me and my sexual orientation.
Abuse Of Power
33 signed
We believe this violation is an abuse of power and that the avatar is NOT inappropriate and does NOT violate the rules of EpicMafia.
There's a difference, harunan, from a non-pornographic picture being drawn by someone who draws pornographic pictures and cropping a pornographic picture for an avatar.
I think it's easy enough to find a non-pornographic source for two shirtless men, if that's what he wants his avatar to be, and problem solved.
Now HONESTLY this does have some forms of BS in it considering it was 1. Pre approved, and 2. People keep saying they can't reverse image it (wouldn't try myself), but other than that, I really don't see that big of a deal with mods not wanting people to use x-rated sources for their avatars, even if cropped
deletedalmost 10 years
Why is there a need for anyone to have borderline x-rated avatars
I've been acquiring some new gay kissing gifs for use as emotes. Thanks mods for giving me this extra time to reflect. :)
deletedalmost 10 years
because men who are shirtless automatically mean theyre from a ???? and what are shorts????
besides, as i stated, as per google adsense guidelines shirtless men are fine even if the avatar is cropped. and it's not googleable so this is stupid.
deletedalmost 10 years
Anything that's clearly not from pornagraphy or obviously naked
These guys easily are from a and naked
deletedalmost 10 years
what if my avatar is reverse searched and ppl find the artist also draws [naughty stuff]???? will it be removed too?????
deletedalmost 10 years
what you think =/= what is vio worthy.
deletedalmost 10 years
I still think it sucks
deletedalmost 10 years
you must hate cfm then since shirtless men are left and anything as long as it's not a full slip is fine (side , scantily clad tops, bikinis etc)
Homophobic Abuse Of Mod Power
