Epicmafia

almost 11 years

deletedalmost 11 years

Retti says

i skimmed the pastebin, darkbot/laser are condemning but i've had people tell me that they could just be abc accounts but it's a postulating theory that i dont really care to delve into

You mean like people said Ghetti & co were Abc accounts framing Sidekick last time? *rolls eyes*

deletedalmost 11 years

u upvote me all teh time............

deletedalmost 11 years

Shut up

blank

almost 11 years

GUy,s This is the First Time i will Upvote Connor in my Entire Life, im going SHivv-mode right now

deletedalmost 11 years

Retti says

i wish i had a giant sign i could wear around my neck saying 'i am not a cheating mod' when such issues come across

i skimmed the pastebin, darkbot/laser are condemning but i've had people tell me that they could just be abc accounts but it's a postulating theory that i dont really care to delve into

Jesus Christ

deletedalmost 11 years

I never stated people should "ignore" them because, well, statistically speaking it'd make sense for a former cheater to do it again. Like you'd expect a 2 time GTer to GT again, yet you look into proper evidence before instantly ruling on them.

deletedalmost 11 years

I'm battering away at my keyboard at a rate of knots

deletedalmost 11 years

dont plus a post that uses the r-word thanjks

deletedalmost 11 years

i wish i had a giant sign i could wear around my neck saying 'i am not a cheating mod' when such issues come across

i skimmed the pastebin, darkbot/laser are condemning but i've had people tell me that they could just be abc accounts but it's a postulating theory that i dont really care to delve into

deletedalmost 11 years

That's what I'm saying - don't ignore it, just don't go solely off of it.

Giga

almost 11 years

tl;dr there's nothing wrong with assuming a cheater who cheated before then got unbanned cheated again, but banning them based off of that assumption alone is unequivocally r-word

Giga

almost 11 years

Jackhammer are you saying that I should ignore a trend that has gone on for about four years now that strongly suggests that a former cheater is likely to cheat a second time? If I was a mod you know what I'd do, but I'm not a mod anymore so I'm saying what I think happened since I cbf to read entire pastebins. When I was a mod I wasn't wrong a single time when doing cheating reports, I know about the process. But to ignore the trend of former cheaters cheating again is silly in my opinion

Should we use it as evidence for a ban? No, that would be really stupid but ignoring it completely is dumb as well

olorloser

almost 11 years

Nonon says

alise says

ban Connor too, he probably cheated with her

lucky star is gross

ur gross

blank

almost 11 years

Nonon says

alise says

ban Connor too, he probably cheated with her

lucky star is gross

was going to diss you for this but this post got me howlin'

deletedalmost 11 years

alise says

ban Connor too, he probably cheated with her

lucky star is gross

MAKISHlMA

almost 11 years

howlin'

deletedalmost 11 years

Jackhammer says

Lashka says

If the probability based on previous cases is above 50%, then the statistical assumption for people who can't be bothered to read games to make is indeed to assume guilt, though, Basil.

But it still doesn't make it right to assume. You look through the evidence and reach an appropriate verdict. that's the right way to do it.

No one cares about being right they care about blood

deletedalmost 11 years

The right way for the 'Jury', or Mods, to do it. The general public make their minds up in high profile cases without seeing 90% of the evidence.

deletedalmost 11 years

Lashka says

If the probability based on previous cases is above 50%, then the statistical assumption for people who can't be bothered to read games to make is indeed to assume guilt, though, Basil.

But it still doesn't make it right to assume. You look through the evidence and reach an appropriate verdict. that's the right way to do it.

blank

almost 11 years

ban Connor too, he probably cheated with her

deletedalmost 11 years

Shivv says

the fact the aforementioned fact

was going to diss you for this but this post got me howlin'

Shivv says

Let's ping Delicate for deets

blank

almost 11 years

i cheated

deletedalmost 11 years

If the probability based on previous cases is above 50%, then the statistical assumption for people who can't be bothered to read games to make is indeed to assume guilt, though, Basil.

deletedalmost 11 years

Let's ping Delicate for deets