Back to Epicmafia

Sidekick

deletedover 10 years

MAn

http://hastebin.com/raw/relobucuni

blank
over 10 years
No
deletedover 10 years

Retti says


i skimmed the pastebin, darkbot/laser are condemning but i've had people tell me that they could just be abc accounts but it's a postulating theory that i dont really care to delve into



You mean like people said Ghetti & co were Abc accounts framing Sidekick last time? *rolls eyes*
deletedover 10 years
u upvote me all teh time............
deletedover 10 years
Shut up
blank
over 10 years
GUy,s This is the First Time i will Upvote Connor in my Entire Life, im going SHivv-mode right now
deletedover 10 years

Retti says

i wish i had a giant sign i could wear around my neck saying 'i am not a cheating mod' when such issues come across

i skimmed the pastebin, darkbot/laser are condemning but i've had people tell me that they could just be abc accounts but it's a postulating theory that i dont really care to delve into



Jesus Christ
deletedover 10 years
I never stated people should "ignore" them because, well, statistically speaking it'd make sense for a former cheater to do it again. Like you'd expect a 2 time GTer to GT again, yet you look into proper evidence before instantly ruling on them.
deletedover 10 years
I'm battering away at my keyboard at a rate of knots
deletedover 10 years
dont plus a post that uses the r-word thanjks
deletedover 10 years
i wish i had a giant sign i could wear around my neck saying 'i am not a cheating mod' when such issues come across

i skimmed the pastebin, darkbot/laser are condemning but i've had people tell me that they could just be abc accounts but it's a postulating theory that i dont really care to delve into
deletedover 10 years
That's what I'm saying - don't ignore it, just don't go solely off of it.
Giga
over 10 years
tl;dr there's nothing wrong with assuming a cheater who cheated before then got unbanned cheated again, but banning them based off of that assumption alone is unequivocally r-word
Giga
over 10 years
Jackhammer are you saying that I should ignore a trend that has gone on for about four years now that strongly suggests that a former cheater is likely to cheat a second time? If I was a mod you know what I'd do, but I'm not a mod anymore so I'm saying what I think happened since I cbf to read entire pastebins. When I was a mod I wasn't wrong a single time when doing cheating reports, I know about the process. But to ignore the trend of former cheaters cheating again is silly in my opinion

Should we use it as evidence for a ban? No, that would be really stupid but ignoring it completely is dumb as well
olorloser
over 10 years

Nonon says


alise says

ban Connor too, he probably cheated with her


lucky star is gross


ur gross
blank
over 10 years

Nonon says


alise says

ban Connor too, he probably cheated with her


lucky star is gross


was going to diss you for this but this post got me howlin'
deletedover 10 years

alise says

ban Connor too, he probably cheated with her


lucky star is gross
MAKISHlMA
over 10 years
howlin'
deletedover 10 years

Jackhammer says


Lashka says

If the probability based on previous cases is above 50%, then the statistical assumption for people who can't be bothered to read games to make is indeed to assume guilt, though, Basil.


But it still doesn't make it right to assume. You look through the evidence and reach an appropriate verdict. that's the right way to do it.


No one cares about being right they care about blood
deletedover 10 years
The right way for the 'Jury', or Mods, to do it. The general public make their minds up in high profile cases without seeing 90% of the evidence.
deletedover 10 years

Lashka says

If the probability based on previous cases is above 50%, then the statistical assumption for people who can't be bothered to read games to make is indeed to assume guilt, though, Basil.


But it still doesn't make it right to assume. You look through the evidence and reach an appropriate verdict. that's the right way to do it.
blank
over 10 years
ban Connor too, he probably cheated with her
deletedover 10 years

Shivv says

the fact the aforementioned fact


was going to diss you for this but this post got me howlin'

Shivv says

Let's ping Delicate for deets

blank
over 10 years
i cheated
deletedover 10 years
If the probability based on previous cases is above 50%, then the statistical assumption for people who can't be bothered to read games to make is indeed to assume guilt, though, Basil.
deletedover 10 years
Let's ping Delicate for deets