over 10 years

Why is the thread locked even?

Why is lucid not bothering to make a censoring system himself where it will censor the word by itself and let admins add any words possible?

Do it lucid.
3 signed
I'm sure you will since you take this issue seriously.
List of insults
15
thebrontosaurus
6
*********
3
[REDACTED]
over 10 years

Kerry says

measures are ok but going this far is a bit ridiculous lmfao


I agree, but unless the censor gets removed and we get the okay that we can swear again or use bad language, then this is how it's going to have to be, unfortunately.
deletedover 10 years

thebrontosaurus says


Giga13 says

So basically if I'm reading this right

They removed those vios and now have a new stricter precedent

Ok that's good. I appreciate consistency. But lucid never asked for it to be this strict. I doubt he cares but the stricter precedent is unnecessary imo.


Would I be this strict otherwise? The censor was there for a reason. We took measures to get the ads back.


Measures that were, in actuality, already in place, save for an active forum thread containing private messages of a certain user's inbox.
over 10 years

thebrontosaurus says


Giga13 says

So basically if I'm reading this right

They removed those vios and now have a new stricter precedent

Ok that's good. I appreciate consistency. But lucid never asked for it to be this strict. I doubt he cares but the stricter precedent is unnecessary imo.


Would I be this strict otherwise? The censor was there for a reason. We took measures to get the ads back.


I thought he was busy sorry

If you put that it was lucid's idea in your new thread then I really wouldn't be hating anything since it's his site
over 10 years
i'm pretty sure adult content consists of anything of a sexual nature
deletedover 10 years
Google has nothing about saying bad words.
over 10 years
measures are ok but going this far is a bit ridiculous lmfao
over 10 years
frick this
over 10 years

ScubaSteve says

The mods could've also elected not to dish out violations for saying "f*ck" to begin with just to get people they dislike violations too. But you know.


This minus the last part because they don't do that
deletedover 10 years

Sachy says

Retti that's why the thread was called consistency


well ok

i think both extremes are silly and wish we could all be sensible people and just like

not care because the IC violation is a joke anyways
over 10 years

Giga13 says

So basically if I'm reading this right

They removed those vios and now have a new stricter precedent

Ok that's good. I appreciate consistency. But lucid never asked for it to be this strict. I doubt he cares but the stricter precedent is unnecessary imo.


Would I be this strict otherwise? The censor was there for a reason. We took measures to get the ads back.
deletedover 10 years
Retti that's why the thread was called consistency
over 10 years
you should probably say who youre talking to :x
deletedover 10 years
im upset because now i have to type like steven would **** censoring every cuss word that comes out of my keyboard
over 10 years
over 10 years
So basically if I'm reading this right

They removed those vios and now have a new stricter precedent

Ok that's good. I appreciate consistency. But lucid never asked for it to be this strict. I doubt he cares but the stricter precedent is unnecessary imo.
over 10 years
let's try not to bypass the censor please, i suggest editing your posts.
deletedover 10 years

ScubaSteve says

The mods could've also elected not to dish out violations for saying "f*ck" to begin with just to get people they dislike violations too. But you know.


this then you wouldn't have a 3 page thread.
deletedover 10 years

Kerry says


ScubaSteve says

The mods could've also elected not to dish out violations for saying "f*ck" to begin with just to get people they dislike violations too. But you know.


damn, the "" make everything ok like f-word


It's fine because I'm educating fools ITT
deletedover 10 years

ScubaSteve says

The mods could've also elected not to dish out violations for saying "f*ck" to begin with just to get people they dislike violations too. But you know.


when did this happen
over 10 years

ScubaSteve says

The mods could've also elected not to dish out violations for saying "f*ck" to begin with just to get people they dislike violations too. But you know.


damn, the "" make everything ok like f-word
over 10 years
I'd rather give less vios than more vios, which is why the announcement was super lenient for people who did bypass and get reported for it.
deletedover 10 years
The mods could've also elected not to dish out violations for saying "f*ck" to begin with just to get people they dislike violations too. But you know.
over 10 years
her vio was removed giga
over 10 years

Laexio says


Giga13 says


Laexio says


Giga13 says

You failed to read in context and that angered me irl


i didn't fail to. i just didn't want to rise to your comment. after all, i do still like you.


this is not about liking each other lol

this is about.. adsense being bad


american conservatism at it's finest. it's also lucid's rules so the mods gotta do what they gotta do. they obviously made this new thread in the hopes of establishing some consistency and avoid caroline getting vios and peta getting off with a verbal warning.


well they could just give peta a vio, imo
over 10 years
pranay was more or less complaining because caro got a vio + peta didnt