I'd say a period of two and a half years of good behavior would suffice. This should especially apply to one-off cases, where someone screwed up and was clean afterwards, like Edark.
Someone who cheated while being a mod should never be trusted again though (Wonderland, danimullens, etc though we know they're not coming back)
deletedabout 10 years
Does this mean administration will mod cheaters is a likely possibility?
I think that's a valid point, Vancy. What period would you suggest? (That's my personal opinion btw)
deletedabout 10 years
For future reference, does this mean the precedent will continue to be upheld that cheaters cannot be mods?
Precedent was broken by Laurie.
I'm surprised no one remembered that example. It happened quite recently.
I think its also worth adding that in the past, the moderation of the site was really just so new that cheaters couldn't be trusted again. Now that some of those cheating cases are upwards to 3 years old, I think that the probation period should be over for a few of the veteran cheaters.
The one thing Taco Bell has going for it is that AM crunchwrap is really good and the waffle taco is decent too
Idk about the waffle taco, sounds gross cuz I dislike sausage, but the crunchwrap supreme is amazing, the chicken quesadilla is, too, and I grew up eating the mexican pizzas so I like them still too :')
A psych test should be mandatory for mods. Although I suppose that would disqualify several of the current ones and most of the aspiring ones.
im curious as to what kind of test you're referring to, but i get the feeling engaging on the forums with you isn't worth it. so i won't
It wouldn't actually be feasible. But they should at least impose an age restriction as a last ditch effort to force some of our older users to actually apply themselves and do something with their lives.
If you are in your mids 20s and do not have a college degree or a stable career you should be getting it together, not modding a java mafia website.