If sharing accounts with a banned user and letting them file through reports is not sufficient to be demodded, then what the hell is?
This is exactly why people find the moderation staff a joke, really. This is basically a statement saying "yes, we're unwilling to properly punish our friends, deal with it". The point still remains that if you want a moderation team people actually trust, then maybe making up for past mistakes like that would be a good starting point.
It's not stupid and unrealistic to rectify an obvious mistake. What's stupid and unrealistic is expecting people not to care.
no guiltytownie. that's not how it works. kino was likely reprimanded for her actions. but the decision was made that demodding was not part of the "punishment". that decision was made and kino has done nothing wrong since, so asking for a 6monthlate re-do is stupid and unrealistic
I normally don't care about any of this, but this is actually the dumbest thing I've read in a very long time. I don't even know kino, nor do I particularly care about the mod drama, but if this... THIS is the argument given to why someone shouldn't be punished for breaking the rules, I actually feel my intelligence offended.
The answer shouldn't be "well it happened a while back who cares", it should be "let's rectify our mistake". What the hell? How can anybody take you seriously?
That was the same admin who covered up for a cheater mod and knowingly let cheaters trophy because he wanted "good PR" though so idk why you'd give a dang what vancyon thought about anything
deletedalmost 10 years
it was deemed "not enough" when it was found out by the admin. so ranting on about it now is pointless