What jambecca said.

Heh, I'm loving it mate. It should definitely be included in the game.

still like it, but it seems too complicated

Well, the whole "Kill" backstory is filled with elipsis' of cannibalism. I'm just afraid that if I reword it to actually say "Eat" it may get a bit confusing.

I think the Cannibals should "eat" instead of "kill"...I mean they eat people right? It fits the role better. But I do like this one so I'll +K it.

Note: It was originally two days of error until they begin to die. Should I revert it or keep with the "If they nokill, or the target doesnt die. A random cannibal dies instead" Also, should the dead friendly be un recognisable aswell?

It seems very interesting.

So, that role that gives bread is the only one able to hold them, and he must give bread to all of them to stop their kill?

But it seems weak against other groups, since canibals can't recruit.

Thanks Pecan, Any suggestions/ideas otherwise?

I think this role should be made. :)

Jamb, that was the idea. I am rather masochistic.

lol do you think we care whether or not you used an I or an l lmfao, that just made my day xD NOTE: IT IS A CAPITAL i INSTEAD OF AN L lmfao... does it look like we give a fuck ! you made my day :p... not to be mean lol that just made me laugh :p... anyway... i would really like to see this in the game! so cool!

Negged for saying "Le" Cannibal on the front page.

Thanks kana, should be fixed now.

"* If successfully killed, the targets name and role." wha...?

@MegaDesk
 
For the Setup, I was thinking 1 Baker, 1 Cop, 1 Mort, 1 Doc, 2 Blues, 3 Cannibals.

This would force the Cannibals to hunt down the Baker, or the cop. Mortician would allow roles to be revealed one day delayed. Making him extremely valuable. Mort may even claim D1 like most cops do.

See the thing about these roles people are making is that they are good ideas, but need a setup to fit them.

I mean... really this role is maybe a few tweaks and a balance check away from being playable. But honestly, in EM there are just too many limitations to where the idea can't be properly handled.

But.. if you can come up with a strong setup with a Cannibal gang in it, then I'll give you a +1.

Gangplank, The Cannibals do have the ability to eat their own team-mates, However it must be a majority vote. This would allow missception and other imba tactics.

I would much rather the current Werewolf be reworked into being called Cannibal and a new Werewolf role be made that appears blue to self but randomly kills during night without knowing.

Should be able to eat teammates for shits and giggles :3

whats the point of not revealing the name of the person that is eaten?

Alright, Modifying role so that a random member dies whenever they fail to kill. Also, what if you had to vote on who to kill, within the group?

What sebang said, if there are several cannibals who fail to kill, one should die right away. Reason could be that the two cannibals don't get any food and thus one cannibal eats the other one to survive. This is to be chosen randomly

how about they fail to kill if ANYBODY ELSE visit's their target on the same night, and every time they fail to kill one of them dies instead... definitely survive famine tho, lmao!

@Super,
 
I guess you are right, However. The "Doesn't reveal victims name" theme will hopefully make the game interesting, (Assuming name is removed from the history of the match) It would force people to keep track of everyone. Adding a bit of chaos.

It's interesting, but wouldn't process of elimination make it completely obvious who was killed? Hiding the role is one thing, but hiding the identity of the person killed seems a bit pointless, since it'd be obvious anyway. The rest of it seems pretty cool, though.