Scenarios have occured that, together, clearly demonstrate that the moderator team is severely racist.
Scenario one:
I use the n-word in the context "[name] called me a n-----". I receive a hateful comments violation for using the n-word in my sentence. This was despite my use of the word clearly not being in a hateful context.
The second comment in the screenshot refers to this report https://epicmafia.com/report/254962 which charley gave a no-vio to, of course with no explanation (moderators protect their own)
After being reported for the second comment, bsm still received no-vio, even though it's obvious that if a non-moderator was repeatedly racist after being reported for it then they would probably get banned https://epicmafia.com/report/254965
Additional:
Throughout this thread, BSM has defended his multiple racist posts by saying that he is white. He states it is not possible to be racist against white people if you are white. Supposedly, this is what makes his actions appropriate.
Spiritualized, a black, posted "the whites can't handle being called crackers (sorry crackers)". They unequivocally used racist language in a hateful manner. They received a no-vio verdict. This was despite the only purported reason that BSM was not reprimanded not applying here.
The moderators give people vios for even mentioning the n-word. However, they encourage the use of racial slurs against white people. The moderators are perpetuating black privilege and are attempting to engage in a sitewide white genocide.
i don't understand the basis of the argument or what's actually going on here but what i DO understand is that the whites can't handle being called crackers (sorry crackers) and that apparently having a job is shameful so you have to pretend not to have a job. someone please let me know if i missed anything important from my quick scan of the thread.
You’re one funny aśs dude to believe that I’m gonna buy the idea that you called yourself unemployed as a way to hide the fact that you had a job LMFAO
Hello everyone it’s me BSM giving the opposite of true information so it can’t be leaked >:) When I said I was unemployed??? HA that was to trick you, I’m actually employed! I just didn’t want to out I was employed because there’s leakers.... so I said I was unemployed... so now if it leaks people won’t know the real truth... which is that I’m employed!
BSM, the point is that it doesn't matter who society favors, if I say "white people are inferior to me", I'm being racist. There is no part of that sentence which is excusable by societal effects.
Hey, don't call people pedos when they aren't pedos, stop thinking you can't be racist against white people, refrain from using slurs regardless of what race you are or what race it's being said to, and suddenly the problem is solved!
Yey, EM accomplished something! It wasn't that hard, was it?
On how the infamous, sensitive N-word control us So many artists gave her an explanation to hold us Well, this is my explanation straight from Ethiopia N-E-G-U-S definition: royalty; king royalty - wait listen N-E-G-U-S description: black emperor, king, ruler, now let me finish The history books overlook the word and hide it America tried to make it to a house divided The homies don't recognize we been using it wrong So I'ma break it down and put my game in a song N-E-G-U-S, say it with me, or say it no more
surprised the thread took that long to get Godwinned tbh
2
deleteddeletedalmost 8 years agoedited
How much of a white person's success would you attribute to their skin colour? I would say it's between 75 - 85%. So if they were black then they would be around 80% less successful, even if they had been raised by the same parents with the same amount of money, education and so on (the only difference being skin pigment). NB I am saying this is due to society benefitting white people, not trying to make some racist argument. I used to think it was 95 - 100% but after Obama was elected I reevaluated.
I'm not sure about this. I think our society clearly favours certain groups more than whites. I will not name these groups but they have higher income and have higher scores on IQ tests (created by the gvmt to legitimise racism) than white people. I do think it is possible to be racist against those groups. Therefore, I can't agree that who society benefits comes in to whether it's possible to be racist against someone. In fact, wasn't that argument used by the Nazis to legitimise the holocaust?
i never once said u touched ur students, i did make a joke or 2 which most ppl bar ur sensitive arse can see. i said something about the kid in calciumkid and u reported me for harassment like fk off lmao. that's not on bsm thats on u for crying over nothing.
I mean I didn't use your job as a negative, and I don't talk about my personal life in mod chat, and havent for at least 3 months so uh... idk what you're on about lmao
