yea idk about Vapid's background, but I have degrees in philosophy & computer science, i've done real life AI programming, Vapid is correct that software is not more than just a tool or data (compared to a "someone")
Tons would. It's called ending child molestation. You're a neo-liberal, one who judges and is stuck in her world where she can afford to drop these heavy handed ideals lol
no republican would support all forms of marriage, legalization of all drugs, legalization of prostitution, like me. It's YOUR body and YOUR choice.
AI won't have desires and fears, dreams, any sense of irritability or even memories the way we have it, yeah. So even if they were as smart as us, it wouldn't be unethical to treat them as tools. I agree.
My personal opinion is that the death penalty should only be used toward those who commit any form of terrorism that injures or kills a large amount of people.
Otherwise, I think people should be sent to rot for major crimes.
Usually pedophiles sent to jail are taken care of by other inmates. They carry out their own form of justice.
I still don't like the fact that they die, but if pedophiles are going to be killed, it's probably best by someone already with a history of violence and wrongdoing.
Necrophilia is much different. Even though it's dead, it's still your body until it rots and becomes the earth. When you were alive, you could say "no necrophilia" and it would be wrong for anyone to do so.
The thing is that it also works the other way. If you get consent from the person before they die there's nothing wrong at all to eat him.
the real solution is actually a VR program that simulates their disturbing fantasy, so that anyone can be a degenerate in their own way and we dont have to deal with it in society. let the penalty for real world actuation of said fantasies be incredibly harsh - death or life in prison. but at the same time, let people live out their fantasies in the harmless digital world
even if a bot "had identity" or "had consciousness" it wouldn't really have them in a meaningless sense. even if someone tried to program AI in a "cruel" way, in such a way to make the program suffer, they would fail. AI cannot suffer and it is not subject to the same protections that organic life is. literally 1s, 0s, if-statements
the gay community isnt and never will be for ~oppressed minorities~ the gay community or lgbt community is fighting for the rights of lgbt people,not against oppression
you're not lgbt if you aren't attracted to the same sex in some way or if you aren't trans
its really a common idea its for minorities but it isnt, its for people who are lgbt and no one else
i'm fairly certain that most leftists would not want to associate with somebody who advocates child se x bots. but maybe that's just me? nah it definitely isn't just me
it's like stabbing a real corpse or a pig to practice stabbing an actual person except in this case you've got something that looks, feels, and acts like an actual person there's no way that's going to have any consequencs nope nope nope
if there were sex bot brothels in the future, i would prefer that they had "lolibots" than to punish the sex both brothels who had "lolibots" in their store. it would provide a healthy outlet for goofs
Do all pedophiles deserve death?
