BeepBeepLettuce I am pretty sure everyone thought you were joking around with everyone else in the thread two rounds ago but now you've either way exhausted the joke or are completely wrong
Either way you should stop because it is embarrassing
How am I joking around if I actually pick up some proof?
BeepBeepLettuce I am pretty sure everyone thought you were joking around with everyone else in the thread two rounds ago but now you've either way exhausted the joke or are completely wrong
Either way you should stop because it is embarrassing
How am I joking around if I actually pick up some proof?
BeepBeepLettuce I am pretty sure everyone thought you were joking around with everyone else in the thread two rounds ago but now you've either way exhausted the joke or are completely wrong
Either way you should stop because it is embarrassing
I know it's borderline impossible to have a serious discussion in here but I'll try anyways. Do sheriff setups (this setup is bad, CBA, etc) give too much power to one person to be realistically viable for comp? Winning or losing because of one specific good or bad player feels really strange, given that mafia is at its core a team effort.
I know it's borderline impossible to have a serious discussion in here but I'll try anyways. Do sheriff setups (this setup is bad, CBA, etc) give too much power to one person to be realistically viable for comp? Winning or losing because of one specific good or bad player feels really strange, given that mafia is at its core a team effort.
A lot of setups are unfortunately built like this. Only problem with guns is that town can't attempt to strongarm a gun and the gun shot can be instant without giving people time to do things
Cno and vdli are another two examples of a clear leading
I know it's borderline impossible to have a serious discussion in here but I'll try anyways. Do sheriff setups (this setup is bad, CBA, etc) give too much power to one person to be realistically viable for comp? Winning or losing because of one specific good or bad player feels really strange, given that mafia is at its core a team effort.
I am actually starting to feel sad about how far some of the gameplay has deteriorated up to this point
Someone just faked AFK and then blitzed the votes into a town loss (as mafia). She argued how great the strategy was and other people agreed that she did nothing wrong
Ugh
Definitely not something new. Faking afk falls under isp, not sure if it's an instant vio when it's used to win. I agree though, people are just getting lazy in comp by either just relying on one person to decide the game or they just filler all game then omgus when fosd.
most likely is going to be a vio just reading that summary
I am actually starting to feel sad about how far some of the gameplay has deteriorated up to this point
Someone just faked AFK and then blitzed the votes into a town loss (as mafia). She argued how great the strategy was and other people agreed that she did nothing wrong
Ugh
that was me
deletedover 6 years
I am actually starting to feel sad about how far some of the gameplay has deteriorated up to this point
Someone just faked AFK and then blitzed the votes into a town loss (as mafia). She argued how great the strategy was and other people agreed that she did nothing wrong
Ugh
Definitely not something new. Faking afk falls under isp, not sure if it's an instant vio when it's used to win. I agree though, people are just getting lazy in comp by either just relying on one person to decide the game or they just filler all game then omgus when fosd.