Please then explain how it is ISP(assuming by negligence) if I was participating adequately- I had seen the claim, however I decided that strategically it was better to let him be in cc’d and then prove the following day ; by either dying or vesting random that he was fake.
I did not miss the claim which is the only way u can argue ISP. I don’t want a note cus 20 days down the line someone can argue I was given a note for ISP. Stop using notes as cop outs
I understand your strategy, but it's something very risky and it's better to be done when you're at least townread by the person who's hammering, or you're not self-voting, or there's a bw outside you, etc. You ended up being hammered as unclaimed bs on lylo while a maf was unccd bs.
But yeah a NV would also be fine in your report, I was debating wether NV it or note it for isp by negligence and picked the latter. It was a grey area, not all reports are black and white :)
It doesnt matter if it is risky. It is his call to use that strat or not. Not a mods call. A mod cant decide what strat a player will use. Till now i had your name in my excel sheet as the third best mod. But this note is going to affect your ranking. A mod's job is to moderate. Not to tell what strategy is important.
Devante case is not grey area at all. Not even close. He took a call to rs. You can't vio people for failed rs. And that note implies you are asking him to stop doing that. Which is outrageous.
Please then explain how it is ISP(assuming by negligence) if I was participating adequately- I had seen the claim, however I decided that strategically it was better to let him be in cc’d and then prove the following day ; by either dying or vesting random that he was fake.
I did not miss the claim which is the only way u can argue ISP. I don’t want a note cus 20 days down the line someone can argue I was given a note for ISP. Stop using notes as cop outs
I understand your strategy, but it's something very risky and it's better to be done when you're at least townread by the person who's hammering, or you're not self-voting, or there's a bw outside you, etc. You ended up being hammered as unclaimed bs on lylo while a maf was unccd bs.
But yeah a NV would also be fine in your report, I was debating wether NV it or note it for isp by negligence and picked the latter. It was a grey area, not all reports are black and white :)
Please then explain how it is ISP(assuming by negligence) if I was participating adequately- I had seen the claim, however I decided that strategically it was better to let him be in cc’d and then prove the following day ; by either dying or vesting random that he was fake.
I did not miss the claim which is the only way u can argue ISP. I don’t want a note cus 20 days down the line someone can argue I was given a note for ISP. Stop using notes as cop outs
Me not claiming bs when one maf (who wasn’t leading) and 2 other maf alive is far from GT; are you an rtard?
Who said it was GT??????????????????? You got note'd for isp.
Also please don't use that word
JM if my play in that game is worthy of a note does that mean any time a blue fake claims PR you must cc them?
You're comparing 2 completly different things???????????????????????????? On your game it was a d2 lylo and looking at the context of the game it was pretty obvious the person who claimed your role was maf.
And should a blue should always get a vio for fake claiming ?