You can play with a friend in red hearts where you won’t be effecting the competitiveness for other players. Some people want to trophy and try hard for it and you coming and playing all your games with one friend and having a 84% win rate isn’t really fair for others.

I think it's pretty clear that it meant if I binned them, they'd be getting banned/DQ'd. That isn't hard to comprehend

Yeah but it’s only fair from looking at stats alone shounen has 21/25 wins. Imagine if I played with a friend and had a 84% win rate. It’s not competitive or fair

Thanks for sharing giga? Not sure what the point of that was. I know a meta abuser/cheater when I see one

Every bin i've ever made ended up getting the players involved banned/DQ'd

shounen has 21/25 wins

If they continue to play together though and all you're doing is letting them know they will likely get investigated if they continue, then that's OK, but that's not what they have been told

Every bin i've ever made ended up getting the players involved banned/DQ'd

Yeah but it’s only fair from looking at stats alone shounen has 21/25 wins. Imagine if I played with a friend and had a 84% win rate. It’s not competitive or fair

They're not suspended man

I get what vilden's saying but like it seems cheap to round suspend people based on number of games alone, but yes, it does make moderator work easier

Hugo says

Dave kerry and slowbro played 60 games together and won a trophy. So there is no limit.

I think there are only 50 games in a ten-day round so that's not possible, nice hyperbole

But if they played a lot like that and won a trophy I don't get how you can tell two other people to stop right now and DQ them if they don't without compiling evidence when you didn't for Dave/Kerry/Slowbro...

https://epicmafia.com/round/113

48 with kerry and 11 with enamored. Total of 59. Sorry for saying 60. It is 59.

Giga13 says

If there's no report on them for meta abusing/cheating then mods should not be able to tell them to stop playing with each other. There needs to be compiled evidence with proof and it has to be made in a report before you tell two people to stop playing with each other. We can't just go around telling people to stop without providing evidence.

While I appreciate the mods' efforts since I used to do the same thing with these sorts of investigations, evidence should always have to be provided before telling two users to stop playing together.

Edit: They've played a lot of games together yes, but unless you can find evidence of them cheating then they shouldn't be suspended. If they continue to play together though and all you're doing is letting them know they will likely get investigated if they continue, then that's OK, but that's not what they have been told

First of all, this is a troll thread but to you guys posting: since when do mods have to write pastebins to stop friends playing 30 games with one another? It's always been handled this way. Even lasting into consecutive rounds. So players have been told not to play together at the beginning of a round where a pastebin obviously wouldn't of been possible

It's already asking a lot to write cheat bins (that result in vio's), but neglecting reports is worse. So many toss accounts roam free, for example melonf'ucker, a user with 5 open reports for throwing. He has outlasted the players involved here who knew they were pushing their luck (refer to the title). Like holy s'hit do you want these people investing their lives on simple decisions involving moderation?