Back to Complaints

The Mods Are At It Again

Kirei
about 6 years

Corrupt moderator blacksnakemoan has sent me and shounen a private message telling us not to play games with each other anymore, signing it with “your friendly mod team x”.

Besides the obvious passive aggressiveness dripping from that signature, the sanctions laid upon me and shounen are unjust and peak definition of this place being a toxic environment. It shows that even something like playing a round together with a specific person can result in suspension. It’s discriminatory and hurtful. Yes, we’ve played every round this comp together. No, we did NOT cheat. You can play a game with the same people and not cheat, you know. It’s called having friends. Not to forget, we were on opposite teams a lot of the time, and I’m not even in the top 28 anymore. Why are we being accused of something like this? We did nothing wrong.

Now's your chance to voice your opinion in the form of a poll. Is mod blacksnakemoan corrupt?
29
YES
5
NO
Bebop
about 6 years
Devante
about 6 years

vilden says

Thread is filled with posters who assume a bias was involved in making the simplest of decisions which has no lasting repercussions. It's funny to me the OP believes he is accused of cheating when he is told something completely else, and admits he only posts because he found the message to be "passive aggressive." Ironically it's you guys with a bias for thinking there's been another mod decision therefore another f'uckup


Nah dude I just wanna see a pastebin lol
matt
about 6 years
You both suck independently and don't suck when together

This is justified lol
vilden
about 6 years
Thread is filled with posters who assume a bias was involved in making the simplest of decisions which has no lasting repercussions. It's funny to me the OP believes he is accused of cheating when he is told something completely else, and admits he only posts because he found the message to be "passive aggressive." Ironically it's you guys with a bias for thinking there's been another mod decision therefore another f'uckup
deletedabout 6 years
deletedabout 6 years
KinokoParadise
about 6 years
This is a nice thread.
deletedabout 6 years
if I ever become admin, I will keep mods like slater, devante, giga, denial, but I will also keep vilden as one mod so that we have one idiot in our team who we can use as fool.
vilden
about 6 years
I'm using an example of a decision "based off a whim" but really isn't
Edark
about 6 years
daily reminder that bins are worthless
Devante
about 6 years

vilden says


Devante says


slater says

Yeah cause I know they meta abused, I understood both sides before I posted here, you didn't and immediately took an objective stance which wasn't necessary cause this is clearly one sided

Edit: I'm binning them, sit tight for awhile


U are allowed to take a stance that : u can’t stop people from playing together off a whim based off win ratios


Why not? What stops mods from asking for a players main and banning them if a negative or nonresponse is given? It's the same idea I think. It's not "off a whim" when there is evidence, even if it's not in the form of a bin that you lot wouldn't read anyways


Huh?
Giga13
about 6 years

vilden says

Why not? What stops mods from asking for a players main and banning them if a negative or nonresponse is given


what is this in reply to
vilden
about 6 years

Devante says


slater says

Yeah cause I know they meta abused, I understood both sides before I posted here, you didn't and immediately took an objective stance which wasn't necessary cause this is clearly one sided

Edit: I'm binning them, sit tight for awhile


U are allowed to take a stance that : u can’t stop people from playing together off a whim based off win ratios


Why not? What stops mods from asking for a players main and banning them if a negative or nonresponse is given? It's the same idea I think. It's not "off a whim" when there is evidence, even if it's not in the form of a bin that you lot wouldn't read anyways
Nobody
about 6 years

Devante says


Nobody says

Also Kerry’s/Dave’s games were individually looked at by Nathan who came to the conclusion that no meta abuse/cheating was taking place


Where is the pastebin?


No idea, pm him for it.
Devante
about 6 years

slater says

Yeah cause I know they meta abused, I understood both sides before I posted here, you didn't and immediately took an objective stance which wasn't necessary cause this is clearly one sided

Edit: I'm binning them, sit tight for awhile


U are allowed to take a stance that : u can’t stop people from playing together off a whim based off win ratios
Giga13
about 6 years
well thanks for taking the time to make a bin, since i know i wouldn't if i'm not a mod. legit, thank you
vilden
about 6 years

Hugo says


Nobody says

Also Kerry’s/Dave’s games were individually looked at by Nathan who came to the conclusion that no meta abuse/cheating was taking place


that is what I am saying. Do the same for these guys. Once you get evidence of meta abuse or cheating then you should suspend them.


You huge moron. They aren 't suspended or accused of anything. Their ability to play games together is revoked on the 7th day of a single round. There is no need for a full proof f'ucking case study to tell 2 players they're advantage has become higher than the rest of the competition

6th day, rather
Giga13
about 6 years

slater says

Yeah cause I know they meta abused, I understood both sides before I posted here, you didn't and immediately took an objective stance which wasn't necessary cause this is clearly one sided


to be honest all i want to do is clarify the rules on games played with someone
Giga13
about 6 years
slater is making a bin, he is the only person allowed to post.
deletedabout 6 years
Yeah cause I know they meta abused, I understood both sides before I posted here, you didn't and immediately took an objective stance which wasn't necessary cause this is clearly one sided

Edit: I'm binning them, sit tight for awhile
Devante
about 6 years

slater says

I'm gonna bin them just for the sake of anyone else looking like an idiot trying to take an objective standpoint


Perfect lol
Giga13
about 6 years
alright everybody stop posting none of us have bins
Giga13
about 6 years

slater says


Giga13 says


slater says


Giga13 says

yeah from eyeballing it these guys probably meta abused at the very least but i cbf to make a bin since i don't care enough to


Then stop posting to try and be objective


i'm not going to take 3 hours of my life binning two users i only learned existed today, i'm not a mod anymore


Exaggeration will definitely win you an argument


you don't want me to post unless i'm being objective but you haven't made a bin either

what??? lmao
deletedabout 6 years

Giga13 says


slater says


Giga13 says

yeah from eyeballing it these guys probably meta abused at the very least but i cbf to make a bin since i don't care enough to


Then stop posting to try and be objective


i'm not going to take 3 hours of my life binning two users i only learned existed today, i'm not a mod anymore


Exaggeration will definitely win you an argument
deletedabout 6 years

Nobody says

Also Kerry’s/Dave’s games were individually looked at by Nathan who came to the conclusion that no meta abuse/cheating was taking place


that is what I am saying. Do the same for these guys. Once you get evidence of meta abuse or cheating then you should suspend them.