Why don't you format it, submit it to the iamverysmart reddit institute, and see what the professional world thinks of your opinions groundhogday?

errrr i didn't say you were arguing anything you didn't know. i'm saying that shady's argument is that it can't be by definition possible 100% because it may be impossible to solve whether or not the queens challenge is possible or not and i think that's a matter of either you believe anything that isn't proven impossible is possible, or if you believe anything not proven possible is considered not impossible

I could get heroin, meth, and crack cocaine in less than five minutes if I were so inclined, which I am not.

errrr i didn't say you were arguing anything you didn't know. i'm saying that shady's argument is that it can't be by definition possible 100% because it may be impossible to solve whether or not the queens challenge is possible or not and i think that's a matter of either you believe anything that isn't proven impossible is possible, or if you believe anything not proven possible is considered not impossible

I am sorry for suggesting that you do not have access to the highest-quality weed around, as this is clearly true, instead of just suggesting that you could not tell it from oregano without the intervention of a governing body.

hmmm i suppose the argument doesn't have a right answer. as a psych major we believe anything that isn't proven to be impossible is theoretically possible. as a math major, it seems you believe anything not proven possible isn't necessarily possible, but is classified as not impossible.

Have you ever been to Colorado?

Buy anymore oregano recently Recidivism?

Recidivism says

That's a cool philosophy discussion but really all you need to understand the difference between possibility and probability is the will to

Clearly that will is lacking, because instead of responding to my point, they've instead decided to purport that I've made some claim about CS, a discipline I don't understand.

well his argument is that it may be impossible to find out the possibility of the queens challenge, which doesn't have anything to do with probability unless i'm missing something

Anthony says

mountains on the moon analogy

Good idea. It's not exactly the same though, because in the realm of mathematics and hard sciences the pudding is in the proof, so to speak. If there's no proof, it's no meal at all. I read one CS professor's quote saying something along the lines of "if this was in physics it would be a natural law at this point," because of the evidence that supports P =/= NP. But until there's a proof, it could just be that no one has found a clever enough solution, or that our math isn't advanced enough.

So funny that you feel the need to talk about the SATs, a high school test, because you are insecure about the perception of your intelligence on the epicmafia.com forums

the SAT's i took were out of 2400 and i got a 2130 whats the translation into 1800