I know someone did this a year ago but I liked it and I don't think the thread is around anymore.
Here's how you play: Someone posts a riddle, whoever gets it right gets to post their own riddle, and it continues that way.
Try not to Google the answers, or it won't be any fun! Also, try not to post 2 riddles or more every day to allow everyone a chance to try to answer them!
jack said 3 lies, James said 2 lies(2nd and 3rd), Joe said 1 lie,(2nd) ,John said no lies, James killed jeff
deletedover 7 years
Logic Puzzle: Who killed Jeff?
There were four men accused of killing Jeff. Their names were James, Jack, John, and Joe. Each man had to give three statements about what they know.
James says:
John did not kill Jeff.
I never knew Jeff.
I do not know who killed Jeff.
Jack says:
John killed Jeff.
Jeff was my best friend.
James told three lies.
John says:
I did not kill Jeff.
James was lying about knowing who killed Jeff: it was him.
Jeff was my best friend.
Joe says:
Jeff was John’s best friend.
I knew Jeff.
I don’t know who killed Jeff.
Through your investigations, you know that at least one of the men had played a part in killing Jeff, but only one actually killed him. Also, you find out that one man told no lies, one man told one lie, one man told two lies, and the other man told three lies. You do not know who told how many lies, but you are able to use reasoning to find one man of which you can find out that, through logic, is innocent. You ask the innocent man to give you a final statement. You use the number of lies he told to assume whether the next statement he gives you is true or false.
He says: James knew Jeff.
So, using logic, who killed Jeff? Who told how many lies? Which statements are the lies?
deletedover 7 years
those wouldn't be real rhombuses bc of different bordering side lengths. Easy as that
This is a troll problem it is easily invalidated by basic geometry. All of the rhombuses would have to have the same side length for this to be true and they don't
so you googled the problem and didn't account for the change in speed that i wrote down in my statement of it
lol
anyway here's the solution:
consider when two ants collide. because of the mechanics of the collision, it's the same as if the ants just walked through each other. therefore the problem is equivalent to just having each ant walk along the meter stick at a constant speed, which means the longest time that it would take is for one ant at the very end to walk to the other end, which would take 1 second using the numbers in my formulation
What if there are two ants occupying the same point (which is clearly possible given your previous answer) but starting out in the same direction?
ok i came up with a silly ish answer and then looked it up
i was wrong but my answer was that because your blood contains iron you can put the poles close to your skin and whichever one makes your skin flushed is the one that's magnetic
it's not as clever as the real answer tho but the real answer requires some knowledge of physics
so you googled the problem and didn't account for the change in speed that i wrote down in my statement of it
I'm on phone idiot ! I random guessed! As if I'm going to copy paste that essay n google it
anyway here's the solution:
consider when two ants collide. because of the mechanics of the collision, it's the same as if the ants just walked through each other. therefore the problem is equivalent to just having each ant walk along the meter stick at a constant speed, which means the longest time that it would take is for one ant at the very end to walk to the other end, which would take 1 second using the numbers in my formulation