Back to Epicmafia

The State of Sandbox

over 7 years

For years, this lobby has been stagnant, it has been declining in activity, and it has quickly been losing interest for those of us who have been here for a couple of years. The ownership of the lobby being passed around like a game of hot potato to me was unacceptable and therefore I decided to create a plan to change the lobby and make it a better and safer experience for those of us here. I was made aware that I was the heir to the throne long ago and ever since then, I began to work on some of these ideas. I have been observing the lobby for years and participating when necessary so that I could bring you, the people, the necessary changes that you need.

To begin,

I did not intend to rule alone or with just the moderators I choose, I was not interested in a clique ruling the lobby like we are going to have with an owner like Merlot and like we had with Bebop. This secretive clique may be great for those who Merlot and Bebop are looking out for (themselves, other site moderators), but it is not good for the people. I intended to rule with transparency -- true transparency. I wanted the people of Sandbox to help make decisions and I intended to start up open forums to hear what you had to say on issues such as what the role of the lobby moderator should be since they do not do much (I will talk about this more later on in this thread) and if the moderators and I could not come to a decision about what to do with controversial issues like certain users posting content in the lobby chat, then we'd create an open forum allowing the people to have their say on the issue.

The role of the moderators would drastically change, making them more useful within the lobby as I have seen many people say that moderators just aren't needed in Sandbox, here are the descriptions of the roles that I created with the help of some of my friends which were set to be included in the moderator applications yesterday before the lobby was stolen from me:

Position: Forum Moderator Description: The forum moderator is the peace keeper of the forums. Their responsibilities include sticking the most relevant threads to the lobby wall, moving topics to their appropriate location, judging and enforcing rules violations in forums, and creating topics of interest. You should apply if: You are a very active user. You enjoy reading TheLastProphet’s and MeetTerry’s posts. You are organized.

Position: Games Moderator Description: The Games Moderator will have several responsibilities all of which include keeping the community having fun. The Games mod will be in charge of choosing the stickied setups, hosting setups and introducing new ones, hosting forum games or alternative games outside of sandbox or promoting games others are hosting. You should apply if: You are a very active user. You are creative. You are a good host. You enjoy the mafia based aspect of this mafia simulator site.

Position: Enforcer Moderator Description: The Enforcer Moderator will be the strong arm of the law. They must enforce the rules and will make no leeway for personal relationships. While all mods enforce the rules, the Enforcer Mod will be the primary mod to handle violations, give out punishment, police the lobby wall and lobby chat, and serve anyone who feels their experience in sandbox is being affected by other users. You should apply if: You are a very active user. You consider yourself tempered and level-headed. You are neither an SJW nor a racist. You’re not going to go on a banning spree.

Position: Community Moderator Description: The Community Mod will come up with the lobby announcements. They can keep the community up to date with events users are hosting such as: plugdj, discord, jackbox and movie nights. They will also lead design based aspects of sandbox including choosing the lobby banner, the lobby background, and the lobby polls. You should apply if: You are a very active user. You don’t need to be an artist but should have artistic taste. You communicate well with others and are up to date on social happenings.

We would put great empashize on having more community-orientented games like Dooze's Sandbox Assassin and Amelio's Sandbox Big Brother, SupBros' large games, or Plissken's unique events. We would create a fun lobby where we constantly have events being run and promote these events well rather than leaving the lobby stagnant as I talked about earlier and just having the same setup being hosted every single day.

I had great interest in running a lobby with an enforced set of rules, yet lenient when it needs to be. I had great interest I running the lobby with a policy in which everyone can play in Sandbox, but those who constantly interfere with the functioning of the lobby will be barred from playing here, a fair chance policy. This policy would also state that the moderators and even the owner themselves could not hold grudges and act due to that fact and this would include a fair chance when choosing moderators as well. With the fair chance policy, the moderators must live up to the rule as well and will be held to the highest of standards. In the event we had a moderator abusing their powers like error did, they would be removed from their position because of their interference with the functioning of the lobby. The main rules I believe need to be enforced are those that protect the people from legitimately feeling unsafe within the lobby. The people doxing users, threatening to reveal someone's personal information, and effectively chasing out our active userbase should not be allowed in this lobby -- and Bebop & friends are no stranger to doing this.

http://i.imgur.com/EmBybqe.png Bebop on who he thought the next Sandbox owner would be

http://i.imgur.com/XCsxx5M.png As we know, Bebop and his friends are no strangers to doxing users and threatening to reveal their personal information, this whatever it takes attitude is very telling.

http://i.imgur.com/pIHybZb.png He is not interested in working with the two moderators that have actually been beneficial to this lobby in recent memory. We can easily assume the hivemind believes the same.

I applied to be a moderator of this lobby under other owners in the past and have included my desire to be apart of a team with conflicting opinions in the application, and I have that same wish today and I wish to have people argue against me during these open forum discussions and I wish for people to play devil's advocate and I want to come to the best decisions possible as a result of this. I think it is crucial that everyone feels as though they can speak their true mind instead of feeling like they'll be punished for saying something the owner disagrees with like the moderators felt during Bebop's reign. I may not always make the best executive decision, but if someone can win a debate about something I did, then I think it is very telling that I made the wrong decision because if I was right, I should be able to defend myself and my decision. When Bebop made the many poor decisions he made during his reigns and the community argued against him, he resorted to arguing using jokes and memes to avoid having to actually argue and defend his decision -- this was one of the things I could not stand to do as owner as it is cowardly and it is not for the good of the people.

I was not interested in being pushed around by the site moderators (this is why they removed me, they knew I would not bow down to them) because these same site moderators are the same people that do nothing and in fact, support the doxing, threatening, and chasing away of our people from Sandbox. We needed someone to stand up to these people and I do believe we still need that. No one should fear for their safety on a mafia simulator site, this site should be to have fun, but it is most definitely not fun to have your personal information taken from you and it is not fun to be threatened with it.

I was the owner of this lobby and I was going to make it a great environment for all of us, but the fact is that it wasn't stolen from me -- it was stolen from all of you. During Bebop's reign, I was very much against the shady things Bebop & his friends were doing and fought to expose them and I did so, these people are not looking out for anyone but themselves and those who are in their hivemind. Edark removed me from the owner position because of many things including me openly stating that I do not feel as though he is fit to be an administrator ad he knew he could not control me or intimidate me. Edark did not come to me to ask me what my plans were or what my stance on any controversial issues were like that of the hateful comments rule that he asked baaabaa about when she was the interm owner -- he just removed me. Now the lobby is under the control of someone who has supported doxing users, threatening to reveal their personal information, and then chasing these same users out of the lobby out of fear -- and I just do not find this acceptable. If the people do not believe me to be the right fit to become owner once more, then I am formally giving my support to lobby moderator Dooze as I know she will implement these ideas and many others in order to protect all of you from people like Bebop, Edark, and friends.

Thank you, Jamal Marley

over 7 years

Merlot says

ill activrly read over this completely once im home but atm ive gotta make some frappuchinos


ill take a small kapu please
over 7 years
ill activrly read over this completely once im home but atm ive gotta make some frappuchinos
over 7 years
i'm at work atm but in the future for any mods that come after the one that will be selected a vote of sorts sounds at the very least harmless to try.
over 7 years
i cant believe i, em user verumbark, am agreeing with jamal on something, but tbh
if youre being serious about this and you really did plan to improve things like this
and you were planning to uh. not let the character play into the way you wouldve run things if you know what i mean
then im actually really behind this

the reason i was initially scared to have you as a lobby owner is. well. the way youve treated friends of mine in the past despite a lack of any serious wrongdoing on their part (never threatened anyone, never harassed anyone, didnt really do anything other than treat you in a way you perceived as rude, didnt go out of their way to do it either)
i kinda chalked it up to being part of your character or whatever but it was making them genuinely upset and it seemed like you knew but chose to ignore it
theres also the thing with you being friends with cory, which is kinda ironic, considering the views you and i seemingly share on hate speech and "jokes" of that nature
but like
i heard you were genuinely planning to be serious and stop doing things like that
and i hope thats true bc you really do have some good ideas written here

tl;dr: jamarley is right and there should be a serious change in the way things are run. as (to my knowledge) one of the newest super-active sandboxers, i dont want to have my experience ruined early by someone who thinks its funny to hurt people
over 7 years
Mod the most attractive person in for the job
over 7 years
which is why i insist we could form a small counsel with people that have objectively contributed to sandbox and care about the moderation so that they can vote

the counsel would be formed by people that apply to the counsel (and thus give up the opportunity of becoming owner themselves) and then we can decide on a vote (through a survey site, non-annonymous vote) who these people would be, and then they make a skype group and debate and vote on who deserves it



probably a bit hard to implement but if its done correctly it would be the best way of making the decision so that we can get an owner that most people would agree with
deletedover 7 years
The biggest issue of votes(oh lord are we really taking it this seriously) is that it will be a giant circlejerk. But that is what most teams have been, but the difference between that and owner's divine right is that A bad owner can only be changed through excruciating evidence to Lucid. A bad owner through silly elections can be changed if they only are owner for a certain amount of time. If the people make mistakes, it will be to the people to fix that, instead of everyone trying to pull the one user in charge to favor them the most.

Anyways, that's kind of the point of democracy/laws. If you don't agree with it, get enough people to support your ideas to get things changed.

I don't think this would work for owner necessarily, but should be considered for moderators in the future, instead of being hand-picked from the best apps from moderator.

(Of course, a serious application can still be the requirement to run for mod or something lols)
deletedover 7 years
Which I don't mind because I trust edarks judgment :)
deletedover 7 years
If you don't want a democratic process then how we have it is the only viable way
Overlord Edark chooses and y'all deal with it
over 7 years
And in a group this small it's much more likely that you would have had some sort of interaction with any candidates, positive or negative
over 7 years
Elections are designed for groups larger than this community, where most people would not have personal ties to the person they're voting for and ideally they would vote based on personal belief rather than because of a friendship

Not to say you can't believe your friend could be a responsible and capable owner, but that the motivation behind a vote should not be because of personal ties
deletedover 7 years
Wow so you don't agree with me? Fk you too guy
over 7 years
i just agreed with you @Mongrel
deletedover 7 years
I say we get an electoral college of epicmafia
over 7 years
I just said this.
over 7 years

MrMongrel says

Mod elections sound like a silly concept but frankly a majority of the community opposing or promoting a specific person as owner or mod should be a factor.


of course, community feelings should be taken into account, but outright "democratic" votes will never work for a lot of reasons too numerous to go into.
over 7 years
Mod elections sound like a silly concept but frankly a majority of the community opposing or promoting a specific person as owner or mod should be a factor.

The consensus about Merlot is pretty clear, even if dooze weren't made owner.
over 7 years
deletedover 7 years
Nice deflection
over 7 years
hmmmmmm
over 7 years

CooperD says

I just think given your track record you aren't in a position to feasibly gauge what merits a good decision.


that's just like, your opinion man
deletedover 7 years
I just think given your track record you aren't in a position to feasibly gauge what merits a good decision.
over 7 years

CooperD says


Bebop says


dooze says

democratic vote


you're a good candidate please don't mess up by thinking mod elections can ever be a thing


Seriously why does your opinion even matter?


because i'm a member of the community the same as everyone else. i don't care if you don't like me.
deletedover 7 years

Bebop says


dooze says

democratic vote


you're a good candidate please don't mess up by thinking mod elections can ever be a thing


Seriously why does your opinion even matter?
over 7 years
sandbox is a mess. lets all move to sandbaax