Awfully convenient how this gets passed in the midst of accusations of Russian election hacking and Pizzagate. Russian hacking, which there is no proof of outside of the CIA's 'secret meeting conclusion', sure did cause Hillary's cronies to launder money for their campaign from Saudi Arabia!
By the way, for those curious, the Intelligence Community acknowledges how easy it would be to detect if Russia actually did engage in 'hacking' email servers. It is a question of tracing network login origins. The only 'hacking' by Russia up for discussion is the manipulation of bots and social engineering on sites like Reddit and Twitter. Those can only go so far in pushing a narrative, and you can bet Twitter and Reddit worked hard to clear Trump-supporting bots.
Oh, and let's not forget the fact that the CIA just so happens to be responsible for rigging the elections of 3rd world countries all around the globe, such that they become politically and thereby economically dependent on Western banking interests.
you do realize 9/11 was already proven to have been orchestrated by the saudi arabian government, who was financially in cahoots with clinton and bush, right?
the rest of the 9/11 conspiracy nonsense is intentional fluff to distract from the bombshell that was the redacted 9/11 commission pages that, as we now know, literally spell out saudi arabia's direct governmental relations to al qaeda, osama, and the 9/11 plot.
just to reiterate, that is the same saudi arabian govt that poured hundreds of millions into clinton's 2016 campaign
hey, did you know the two russian "compounds" that got closed down were facilities used by diplomats, and we have 2 in russia as well? and in response, Russia is closing them and sending our diplomats home! haha, wow, what a coincidence! and the expelling of diplomats in this fashion is a clear violation of the Vienna Convention, but that sounds made up, haha!
im not sure how you can conceive this differently than the government funding the media it prefers, as well as effectively labeling and choosing what it deems "propaganda" for the american public, but hey, let's not bother investigating further. only a dirty commie would do that
All I know, is that when I'm making arguments defending my choice in news sources and their journalistic integrity (IF THERE IS SUCH A THING ANYMORE!!!), I make sure to cite online articles penned by famed fictional character "Tyler Durden".
deletedover 9 years
Haha! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
deletedover 9 years
Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft.
Lokey, a former paid Zero Hedge writer who left the website in 2016 over disagreements in editorial direction, characterizes the site's political content as "disingenuous," summarizing its political stances as "Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry=dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft."[1]
Zero Hedge is an English-language financial blog that aggregates news and presents editorial opinions from original and outside sources. The news portion of the site is written by a group of editors who collectively write under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden" (a character from the novel and film Fight Club).
Zero Hedge's content is conspiratorial, anti-establishment, and economically pessimistic,[3] and has been criticized for presenting extreme and sometimes pro-Russian views.[1][4][5]
deletedover 9 years
I'm not saying it's necessarily ALL fake news, especially since the act mentioned is quite real, but this doesn't really help the case you're trying to make:
