Back to General Discussion

posted to be rated on positivity

deletedover 8 years

be rated on positivity but if i dont know you eh

NEGATIVE

lilin

roadman

groundhogday

Discordia

izzy

Cody

Sincerely

Zhourb

SimplyPam

Tatami

harod

Ariel

trolleyz

xSoniaNeverMindx

edark

Matt12

ChilledOut

POSITIVE


POSITIVE-NEGATIVE DICHOTOMY DOES NOT APPLY

Winx

Himiko

Should other's means be used for your means
13
Yes
6
No
over 8 years
I think our good old pal satan should know quite a lot about this subject.
over 8 years
Cody - "most mentalization behavior that we observe in non-human species is attributed to behavior-reading which requires less mental complexity to achieve. for any given situation, a subject that uses the latter (behavior-reading) predicts what other agents do based on patterns and observed data."

This is very true. People usually use this evidence to back up their assumptions about an animals mental capacities and use it to justify anthropomorphising them.

This is also used by law enforcment(by accident perhaps) to get confessions out of innocent mentally ill people whom might lack the understanding of what they are saying or even why they are saying it.

A famous case here in Sweden is about a mentally ill person(Thomas Quick) whom got convicted based soley on his confessions which werent exactly forced per se, but what he said since he got "treats" (medication/compliments) if he did the "right thing" (which was to explain how the murder happend on the crimescene even though he had never been there before) by following the subtle "instructions" of his handler and the police. Even the series "How to make a Murderer" got bits of this in it.
over 8 years
add me in lilin ily
over 8 years
i lve u lilin
deletedover 8 years
negativity with negativity
deletedover 8 years
well you upset me too
deletedover 8 years

veryniceboy says

lilin why won't u rate me :(


harsh words that upset me
deletedover 8 years
lilin why won't u rate me :(
deletedover 8 years
it is pure and unfiltered
over 8 years
Your affection is offensive.
deletedover 8 years
why am i being threatened with a vio for proposing love
deletedover 8 years
dude there's a video of whales teaming up to knock a seal off a chunk of ice by creating waves. that's extraordinary tool use, comparable to anything we might do. our higher level thinking is down to processing power, nothing totally apart. this 'behaviour reading' deal is meaningless. and then there might be literally zero difference between our innate intelligence and that of whales/dolphins, just our intelligence has greater outlet
over 8 years
of course it does; the difference is that in the lack of training data it becomes far less reliable
deletedover 8 years
that behaviour reading gets insanely complex, to the point it is hardly differentiable from anything we do. some of animals conceptions of other animals and just the mechanics of the world are nothing short of profound
over 8 years

Tatami says


Cody says

most mentalization behavior that we observe in non-human species is attributed to behavior-reading which requires less mental complexity to achieve. for any given situation, a subject that uses the latter (behavior-reading) predicts what other agents do based on patterns and observed data. a mentalizing subject constructs the agents' mental model of the situation and predicts using that. it's higher level thinking.


I'm very skeptical of this. This distinction is very difficult to make at some point-dolphins have their own "signature" whistle, not just theirs but for other dolphins as well. Does the association of this whistle to another dolphin serve as a kind of "mental model" to which the name refers? Other animals at least recognize and have stored in their memory a variety of others, be they owners or companions, and the feelings associated with them. What qualifies as a higher level "mental model"? (see: referentialism, internalism in linguistics)

Humans are without a doubt the best at it, but the distinction is odd. You're suggesting a kind of "jump" in cognition, not just one in skill but one in inherent capability. There were more borderline cases in history than in the present day. Go down our evolutionary tree and try to make the distinction at which man was able to make these mental models and predictions you were suggesting. At the species level, some might have been capable of such models, some may not have, some may have been in between.

I recognize that you're arguing for difference in level of complexity in present day, but the criteria you're using to make that distinction is very suspect in my eyes.

Disclaimer: I have studied virtually no evolutionary biology, but this is my best guess.


you just described exactly what i was talking about with behavior reading. the dolphins learn each others' whistles through experience and apply that to their decision making processes.
deletedover 8 years
that is a half-way interesting point of view lol
deletedover 8 years
It's much harder to train a man to sit where he belongs, it takes entire systems of government, police, military, schools.
deletedover 8 years
Dogs are superior to man, dogs know their place.
deletedover 8 years
man should be like a dog isn't it, lilin?
deletedover 8 years
deletedover 8 years
salt
over 8 years

Discordia says

I'm assuming Lilin is referring to Diogenes who made fun of Plato when he gave Socrates' definition of man as a featherless biped by plucking a chicken and bringing it into the academy and going "Behold, I have brought you a man."


no wonder she has no friends
deletedover 8 years
lol
deletedover 8 years
I'm assuming Lilin is referring to Diogenes who made fun of Plato when he gave Socrates' definition of man as a featherless biped by plucking a chicken and bringing it into the academy and going "Behold, I have brought you a man."
deletedover 8 years
lilin rank me i gotta go eat