so now i can effectively refuse to self every game and if the clear decides to get me bwed I can report him for grudge lynching?
i suppose you can argue that it gets a violation because he lynched two people here; but i really can't see the lynches were both based off grudge reading the d1
also, i really don't agree with "With lines like "even if you're doc you're still being voted" they show clear intent to throw the game.". are you going to give a vio to somebody thats stubborn that says something like "i dont care if you're cop im lynching you" if the cop did something stupid and was bwed on?
Okay, I read that game over and over again. It looked to me like MapIya lynched lazy and Maldito because they went against him, not because he FoSed them. He never said a good reason for voting Maldito and admitted to voting randomly. I admit it's somewhat borderline but his motivations for lynching lazy did not seem legitimate to me.
the verdict she gave actually shows she didn't read the game and sustained it entirely off of what he said
deleteddeletedabout 10 years ago
it wasnt refunded. but he only lynched maldito because he kept unvoting and didnt self IMO
deleteddeletedabout 10 years agoedited
also shoutout to mori for handling an appeal directly linked to gerry, your refined objectivity is clearly being displayed in your incorrect verdict of the report.
We've come to the conclusion that there is not enough evidence based on the user in question and the game that was played to support the original grudge-lynching verdict. We also believe that the original verdict would set a dangerous precedent in competitive mafia; we do not want players to be afraid of lynching their scumreads lest they get reported for grudge voting.
If MaPiYa had a rocky history with lazy/Maldito and showed clearly that he was going to lynch them unconditionally, then the original verdict would have held. In this case, however, there is not enough evidence to argue that this was his intent.
As a reminder to everyone: treating your fellow players respectfully in the first place eliminates the roots behind this kind of problem.
It's not gt if he didn't express that he was lynching town because town didn't self vote. Normally the guy who doesn't self for me isn't town. Only maf is afraid of letting me hammer. But if some noob is hammering then I never self vote.
