so basically bernie is going to the convention to make hillary agree to adopt some policies, which is like giving a hungry fat guy a donut if he agrees not to eat it.
that means your black and white choices are richest guy to go bankrupt four times and satan
now, if we elected jill stein, the benefits are just too good to be true:
shatter the two party system, and green is the most fitting color because it completes the three additive primaries
get most people to stop b****ing about voting for women in future elections because v*gina
basically the same policies as bernie sanders, so basically bernie sanders
Golbolco defended my reason for supporting Jill Stein even though she's much like Bernie Sanders on page 1, not because she agrees with Jill Stein but because she knew the actual reason.
even if we don't agree on the truth, we still try to find it
Let's say we have a teeny tiny Sims government that needs to make $1,000 in taxes to stay afloat because it spends almost nothing (libertarian wet dream). It has 100 people, 1 big business making $4,000, and 1 small business making $2,000. How do we get it?
1. Tax every individual $10
2. Tax the small business $200, the big business $400, and every individual $4
3. Tax the small business $200, the big business $600, and every indiidual $2
Look at that rare sight: Two people agreed on something, even if Golbolco didn't realize it at first. I know it's a foreign concept to you cub, but you'll get used to it.
Now where's your statement on Jill Stein's electability?
deletedalmost 9 years
I wouldn't say this is an argument, more of a debate or a discussion of two different political ideologies that we have, I haven't really felt personally attacked once tbh
Why exactly are you trying to bring me into yours and DrPeePee's argument? You've completely ignored Golbolco's fact check on Jill Stein's past polls and election results
So if you really think because I'm choosing not to waste my time discussing the policies of someone who can't win that I'm automatically uninformed, so be it. Have fun in fantasy land.
deletedalmost 9 years
Or you can have a flat tax that treats everyone fairly, or even abolish taxes on businesses since that's like taxing the people twice (once on their income which is reported in owning a business and once on your business)
real tax tiers don't use a logarithm, they're much more balanced such that smaller businesses pay a smaller % and larger businesses pay a larger %, which completely helps small businesses
a flat tax requires smaller businesses to compensate for the loss of revenue from the top, taxing them higher
Calling me a "low information voter" as your initial response to me saying that Jill will certainly not win is a personal attack.
And I'm here to discuss why the only relevant people are Hillary, Trump, and Gary, not to discuss policy. But since all you want to talk about is policy, I'll leave.
deletedalmost 9 years
Flat taxes adjust proportionately. Listen taxes on small business are such a burden to them. But the government won't need as much money to fund it when you start cutting programs and limiting what it does
i dont see a personal attack, i see drpeepee taking a while to tell me how flat taxes benefit small business and croned not even touching on any of these issues while telling me im the uninformed one because of a typo
if you really want to stick it to me and prove me wrong, you can join in the policy discussion.
