neither are violations btw but you could definetly argue giga's is more vioable than the other one lmfao
Views
deletedalmost 10 years
I get that but I feel like it would be a double standard in itself to consider r----d a slur but allow this word, which is highly offensive in the UK and other commonwealth countries, just because it has lost its original meaning in the U.S.
deletedalmost 10 years
the s word just means wacky for 90% of this site's demographic
deletedalmost 10 years
Who made what rule? and I was referring to the word handicap.
Edit: Sadly I have a degree in English and I still messed up that sentence. Feel free to make fun of me for that.
He can't go around using the word s-----c as a buzzword, which he clearly is doing, and he has a history of hateful comments. Just like with Giga, who also has a history of HC, I took that into consideration as well.
With Giga, I thought there was a connection between using the word f-----d and handicap but I was corrected, as it is a sports term and I didn't realize that. Just the single use of the word, which we don't really consider a slur under precedent, I couldn't give him a violation.
No because its hateful language, not aimed at anyone in particular, but hateful nonetheless. HC doesn't have to be excessive but that certainly increases the chances of accumulating a violation.
