neither are violations btw but you could definetly argue giga's is more vioable than the other one lmfao
Views
deletedover 8 years
I get that but I feel like it would be a double standard in itself to consider r----d a slur but allow this word, which is highly offensive in the UK and other commonwealth countries, just because it has lost its original meaning in the U.S.
deletedover 8 years
the s word just means wacky for 90% of this site's demographic
deletedover 8 years
Who made what rule? and I was referring to the word handicap.
Edit: Sadly I have a degree in English and I still messed up that sentence. Feel free to make fun of me for that.
He can't go around using the word s-----c as a buzzword, which he clearly is doing, and he has a history of hateful comments. Just like with Giga, who also has a history of HC, I took that into consideration as well.
With Giga, I thought there was a connection between using the word f-----d and handicap but I was corrected, as it is a sports term and I didn't realize that. Just the single use of the word, which we don't really consider a slur under precedent, I couldn't give him a violation.
No because its hateful language, not aimed at anyone in particular, but hateful nonetheless. HC doesn't have to be excessive but that certainly increases the chances of accumulating a violation.