Welcome to the Daily Drama Report, Sandbox's number one source for juicy drama information! Should you have information on a particular bit of entertaining public drama then please write up an objective report on it and post here. Opinion pieces are also allowed.
The big rule here is that if you're going to write a report here, please do not become directly involved in the drama or else it is very likely to suffer as a piece. Opinion pieces on your own direct drama are allowed, however, as long as they're sensible and not just angry rants at whoever you disagree with.
It is ad hominem. You're bringing up something about ChaoticDoom that has nothing to do with the discussion as if to prove a point. It's like if I said Gardenfulloflies cannot manage a relationship with the community because he is a homosexual and will be unable to connect with the women on the site.
ChaoticDoom clearly knows enough about a relationship to (supposedly) maintain one with his sister. Is he racist for only liking his sister, who most likely is the same race as him meaning he doesn't have attraction to people of other races?
[quote=AItair][/quote]you mean someone thought teplep was cool enough to make fanart of him? thats awesome, congrats teplep, i wonder how many others can say the same here
I found this on google lmao I didn't draw it.... but yeah "fan art" made just for teplep by some random person on google
Altair, I thought it was clear that you take the drama outside of this thread.
Also, ChaoticDoom's relationship with his sister has no bearing on the argument, you're just invoking ad hominem because he dunked you harder than Ballsy at a Chuck E. Cheese skeeball tournament.
It's not ad hominem because it shows how much ChaoticDoom knows about relationships and what's appropriate, our topic is over relationships after all. If I said they would never find love because they're too hideous and therefore their opinion doesn't matter, that would be an ad hominem attack
[quote=AItair][/quote]you mean someone thought teplep was cool enough to make fanart of him? thats awesome, congrats teplep, i wonder how many others can say the same here
I found this on google lmao I didn't draw it.... but yeah "fan art" made just for teplep by some random person on google
Altair, I thought it was clear that you take the drama outside of this thread.
Also, ChaoticDoom's relationship with his sister has no bearing on the argument, you're just invoking ad hominem because he dunked you harder than Ballsy at a Chuck E. Cheese skeeball tournament.
it seems the conflict minigun provoked was mainly fueled by user Altair from one side, facing off against the prominent and controversial freedom-of-speech-and-other-stuff-promoter chaoticdoom, backed by users 161003 "Destinybby" and 482866 "Jimbei". it seems our beloved editor-in-chief Golbolco was asking the real questions: "If you don't like women with big breasts, are you racist against English or Jewish women, who on average have larger breasts? No? Then you're not racist for not liking men with darker skin, which is typically a feature of Sub-Saharan Africans." despite all pleas, it seems Altair has not changed stance on the subject.
what will happen? should we be afraid of where this conflict will go? more at ten.
ChaoticDoom is on the opposite side and is a proponent for incestual relationships need I say more.......
Meanwhile scientific studies link "racial preference" to deep seated bigotry and racial prejudice in other issues https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279863184_Is_Sexual_Racism_Really_Racism_Distinguishing_Attitudes_Toward_Sexual_Racism_and_Generic_Racism_Among_Gay_and_Bisexual_Men TLDR Since none of the people for Racial Prejudice seem to be educated in anything remotely intellectual: "Almost every identified factor associated with men’s racist attitudes was also related to their attitudes toward sexual racism. The only differences were between men who identified as Asian or Indian. Sexual racism, therefore, is closely associated with generic racist attitudes, which challenges the idea of racial attraction as solely a matter of personal preference."
of course I'm not changing my fùcking stance it's the only correct stance there is.
it seems the conflict minigun provoked was mainly fueled by user Altair from one side, facing off against the prominent and controversial freedom-of-speech-and-other-stuff-promoter chaoticdoom, backed by users 161003 "Destinybby" and 482866 "Jimbei". it seems our beloved editor-in-chief Golbolco was asking the real questions: "If you don't like women with big breasts, are you racist against English or Jewish women, who on average have larger breasts? No? Then you're not racist for not liking men with darker skin, which is typically a feature of Sub-Saharan Africans." despite all pleas, it seems Altair has not changed stance on the subject.
what will happen? should we be afraid of where this conflict will go? more at ten.
ChaoticDoom is on the opposite side and is a proponent for incestual relationships need I say more.......
Meanwhile scientific studies link "racial preference" to deep seated bigotry and racial prejudice in other issues https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279863184_Is_Sexual_Racism_Really_Racism_Distinguishing_Attitudes_Toward_Sexual_Racism_and_Generic_Racism_Among_Gay_and_Bisexual_Men TLDR Since none of the people for Racial Prejudice seem to be educated in anything remotely intellectual: "Almost every identified factor associated with men’s racist attitudes was also related to their attitudes toward sexual racism. The only differences were between men who identified as Asian or Indian. Sexual racism, therefore, is closely associated with generic racist attitudes, which challenges the idea of racial attraction as solely a matter of personal preference."
of course I'm not changing my fùcking stance it's the only correct stance there is.
It appears the Sandbox race war has reached the lobby wall as user minigun has provoked a mass debate on whether or not it is racist for preferring the physical attributes of one ethnic group over another. I think Taurarius sums it up perfectly:
"Sandbox attempts to debate whether preferences for different ethnicities is racist/discriminatory, and employs memes, dictionary definitions, and hyperbole to make their points. Everyone involved pretends the design of lobby wall is in any way conducive to this purpose. The rest of us get social activism fatigue from watching them."
it seems the conflict minigun provoked was mainly fueled by user Altair from one side, facing off against the prominent and controversial freedom-of-speech-and-other-stuff-promoter chaoticdoom, backed by users 161003 "Destinybby" and 482866 "Jimbei". it seems our beloved editor-in-chief Golbolco was asking the real questions: "If you don't like women with big breasts, are you racist against English or Jewish women, who on average have larger breasts? No? Then you're not racist for not liking men with darker skin, which is typically a feature of Sub-Saharan Africans." despite all pleas, it seems Altair has not changed stance on the subject.
what will happen? should we be afraid of where this conflict will go? more at ten.
deletedover 8 years
i asked my sandbox owner of a husband to mod me and he refused !!!!!!! uGHHhHHHh filing for a divorce once i get our assets liquidated
It appears the Sandbox race war has reached the lobby wall as user minigun has provoked a mass debate on whether or not it is racist for preferring the physical attributes of one ethnic group over another. I think Taurarius sums it up perfectly:
"Sandbox attempts to debate whether preferences for different ethnicities is racist/discriminatory, and employs memes, dictionary definitions, and hyperbole to make their points. Everyone involved pretends the design of lobby wall is in any way conducive to this purpose. The rest of us get social activism fatigue from watching them."