Epicmafia

Back to Forum Games

Forum Mafia 12

jobey

almost 9 years

day three will end at 11:00 pm on wednesday

countdown to night four: http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20160210T23&p0=234&font=cursive

I. The Schedule:

36 hours per day, 12 hours per night. Days may end early if a majority lynch is reached.

II. The Setup:

Normal closed roles setup, as always, with the roles and affixes listed below. Any role can be town or mafia, and have any number of affixes.
By default there are no Night 1 actions, including the mafia kill.
By default no role can self visit, except watcher.
Players who share a meeting may communicate outside the game at any time of day.
Players are always notified at day start if their role is changed.
One mafia always leads the kill, and it's always the one that submits the kill last. Each mafia will visit the kill target.
On death, players flip their role, alignment and affix type by default, but not their affix details.

III. Supermajority Lynch Rules:

A lynch will happen immediately if a supermajority vote is reached (e.g. 9/16)
At end of day, "No votes" count as "no one" votes, but will not count towards a mid-day supermajority vote of "no one". The player with the most votes at that end of day, (including "no one") will be lynched.
Days can be ended early without a lynch by a supermajority "no one" vote.

IV. Roles/Affixes:

http://pastebin.com/daG9qnqk

V. Voting:

If you want to vote, use this "[b] vote: player name [/b]"

If you want to unvote, use this "[b] unvote: playername [/b]"

A VOTE THAT IS NOT BOLDED WILL NOT BE COUNTED

VI. Voting Log:

http://pastebin.com/kdQVMhbF

VII. The Rules:

http://pastebin.com/cVGQW74j

VIII. Contact:

If you have a question about rules or mechanics, do not ask it in the game. Message me or message Zayn.

Transcend

almost 9 years

If you wanna see ruined forum mafia games check out when abc ruined jaleb's game and xela/petermh ruined gist's. I'm fine here.

deletedalmost 9 years

im blocking him because i might get an aneryusm trying to reason with him. i was trying to get him to speak more about why he felt sincerely contradicted because i was thinking she was a good vote based on my own reasons mostly boiling down to the awkwardness in general from her, and not the same as last game where she claimed to be town outright a couple of times but moreso in her reaction to soda voting her, along with her seemingly doubting herself with lines such as 'well it's d1 im not sure if i should trust my own reads' which isn't good if you're going to out a read then seemingly retract it like such immediately.

Vote: Sincerely

itg321

almost 9 years

vote Transcend if only to get rid of a known toxic, cancerous player whose go to tactic when pressured is insult and harangue every single person who disagrees with him

Retti, if you dont vote soda i will vote u to lynch u

Perish

almost 9 years

Transcend says

Yeah okay let's do this instead. All of this person's posts give me a bad feeling.

Vote perish

Lemme guess; asking you to explain would be an exercise in futility?

itg321

almost 9 years

ok theres another bus (as in public transport not mafia buss) coming. i fos'ed transcend for his daystart and iinitally pushed on him to get him to react.

his terrible reactions, continued goading/insulting of players he disagrees with instead of outting rational fosses made me want him lynched as players like those make it difficult for town to win.

also, sirslick was right i figured we'd have a couple MLs and just wanted a cancerous player out of the game.

i stand by my fosses as soda17 is clearly a badplayer who got most of hist trophs through the cheating ring waybackwhen

deletedalmost 9 years

Remember that time Transcend ruined a forum mafia game....

Transcend

almost 9 years

Yeah okay let's do this instead. All of this person's posts give me a bad feeling.

Vote perish

Perish

almost 9 years

SirSlick says

and doubly on that is perish someone who has an alt as well?

sorry

What could possibly give you that idea..?

jobey

almost 9 years

Stragger says

Transcend says

But the game should have been me vs. him if he didn't retract.

TELL ME ABOUT YOUR READ ON SINCERELY IN MORE DETAIL AND HOW SHE CONTRADICTED HERSELF PLEASE

please only use bold for voting

SirSlick

almost 9 years

and doubly on that is perish someone who has an alt as well?

sorry

Perish

almost 9 years

SirSlick says

also just for me who's retti? stragger?

Yeah

SirSlick

almost 9 years

also just for me who's retti? stragger?

Perish

almost 9 years

I want to say Stragger and Transcend aren't a team but last time I made a read like that I got totally punked.

SirSlick

almost 9 years

you know what stop the mudslinging please

it's hard to get reads for mine if every second fos is tinged with the venom of brutal words

Transcend

almost 9 years

I'm kidding retti

Transcend says

Oh so you joined my army because i towntold. Why the **** would you betray my army if i towntold?

deletedalmost 9 years

Literally decides to try to strongarm the game yet gives no reasoning for any votes and refuses to answer any questions.

deletedalmost 9 years

Transcend should sub out.

deletedalmost 9 years

absolutely ridiculous.

Transcend

almost 9 years

Please only use bold for voting.

Perish

almost 9 years

Transcend says

But the game should have been me vs. him if he didn't retract.

His point is that making all the discussion center around a single 1v1 would make getting reads outside those two difficult. I think.

Edit: and also that no one would be giving reads on anyone else which is bad.

deletedalmost 9 years

Transcend says

But the game should have been me vs. him if he didn't retract.

TELL ME ABOUT YOUR READ ON SINCERELY IN MORE DETAIL AND HOW SHE CONTRADICTED HERSELF PLEASE

SirSlick

almost 9 years

well obviously it seems that he did it to try to push his agenda

which i would have seen as justifiable if i also fos'd soda but i didn't so to me it was more throwing his toys out of his cot to get what he had wanted

Transcend

almost 9 years

But the game should have been me vs. him if he didn't retract.

Perish

almost 9 years

SirSlick says

i love how we're not asking itg why he fakeclaimed that

i guess it's because he's at work but i'll dangle the carrot now, when he gets back i'd like a justification

What do you think of his fakeclaim, SirSlick?

deletedalmost 9 years

Perish says

Stragger says

usually in these cases they end up being TvT and based on how they're at each other's throats im likely to lean that side, especially given soda's lack of backing off. if he were to cower at itg i might've thought different but the fact remains that the burden of proof is mostly on soda to prove that itg is faking and quite frankly with a PR claim i don't see him taking that risk, which is why he is more dummy than scummy if i haven't explained already.

Stragger says

if the two keep being at the throat of each other nothing will get done and scum will be allowed to coast freely and just be able to hop another side, which is what im trying to prevent. do you think one of them is scum?

These posts suggest you were at least entertaining the possibility of a retract. And if I were, say, UltraAug who made them I would totally be on board with applying a lot of pressure to him here. but grilling a thorough player for being thorough seems really desperate.

no, all i cared about was making sure the game didn't devolve into the two going at each other so i tried to get soda's attention and push discussion elsewhere, which still is not happening despite all my efforts. i felt the need to intervene for my own sake as trying to read everyone who would only pick a side (as that's what felt would happen) would be a major headache and such has happened before in one of my forum games where a player tunneled the other until no end and created a whole vortex where it was basically a dichotomy between the two.