36 hours per day, 12 hours per night. Days may end early if a majority lynch is reached.
II. The Setup:
Normal closed roles setup, as always, with the roles and affixes listed below. Any role can be town or mafia, and have any number of affixes.
By default there are no Night 1 actions, including the mafia kill.
By default no role can self visit, except watcher.
Players who share a meeting may communicate outside the game at any time of day.
Players are always notified at day start if their role is changed.
One mafia always leads the kill, and it's always the one that submits the kill last. Each mafia will visit the kill target.
On death, players flip their role, alignment and affix type by default, but not their affix details.
III. Supermajority Lynch Rules:
A lynch will happen immediately if a supermajority vote is reached (e.g. 9/16)
At end of day, "No votes" count as "no one" votes, but will not count towards a mid-day supermajority vote of "no one". The player with the most votes at that end of day, (including "no one") will be lynched.
Days can be ended early without a lynch by a supermajority "no one" vote.
"Forced" is a word reserved for inarticulate dunces like yourself. Nothing about anything I said was forced. I was giving tepid observations and putting forth plausible conclusions from those events as they happen because that's how I play. That's how I've always played.
The only thing "forced" here is you trying to force a reason for a vote, and it's entirely obvious you did so because you can't actually explain in the slightest and it's blatantly false.
Even if I had said "my read is that Stragger and Transcend aren't a team" how is that possibly a forced read you don't think I really have. What the hell does that even mean? You made something up on the fly and now you're flailing since you got called out on it.
I literally purposefully abstained for cementing that read and said so in the post you imbecile. I highlighted my own uncertainty, ie I wasn't making a confident read.
That's an observation. I didn't say "my read is that itg is scum". Earlier I implied itg was town; that wasn't a read either. I'm just giving my thoughts on what happens around me as I go. The only read I'm comfortable making right now is that you're scum because you tripped up by dropping your "I refuse to explain myself" defense and gave a blatantly forged explanation.
If you're just going to vote gut reads and refuse to explain yourself, fine, I can buy that's just a thoughtless, poor town player. but making stuff up in order to justify your reads is actually horridly scummy and should warrant a lynch.
Actually, you clearly just made something up that's not true at all. I literally said a couple pages ago I don't have reads and now you're pushing me "for having reads." You blatantly made up a reason on the fly.
I don't have any reads, idiot. It's day 1 and I'm pretty much lost as hell. you on the other hand are putting words in my mouth to justify a really stupid, gut feeling push.
the thing with forum mafia is it's a lot easier to ignore badtown than it is in game-mafia because you can't exactly violate the eyes of all the other players with spamming of the chat, so if you think he is obstructive then the best course of action would be to just let the guy implode and go for a bigger fish, would it not itg?
