nope, the cop decided not to claim and thus didn't inform the town of a confirmed mafia which puts the entire town at a huge disadvantage and hence warrants a refund.
real cop gets innoed by his cc and doesn't cc; he lets maf get real ML with a santa alive. he lies about reports (when lying can be considered a slip since theres a lawyer in play), he lies about softs, yadda yadda yadda.
the absolute dumbest thing about is how he got a NO VIO until i had to appeal for a note. the name just screams gt account and hasnt even been played since the day as well
gerrys santa game better not get a refund, maybe it was even bad play and the kid didn't even know it was mylo
i can agree with the other one in a sense when the guy hammered the wrong cop (likely because that was a straight gamethrow) but it can be taken to bad play by the real cop for not explaining the situation once he cced
edit: by bad play i meant the real cop could've unvoted to explain it to the guy, since he was clearly responding at the time
i care a bit but not close to enough to continue to argue, but it shouldn't have been refunded lol
deletedalmost 9 years
you're assuming they play optimally when playing optimally puts them at 33% and saying that's advantageous
deletedalmost 9 years
from him outting his role when his cc has an inno on him??? idk dude
deletedalmost 9 years
how can you think town has an advantage from this
deletedalmost 9 years
and if they decided not to lynch in 1/3 for autowin they would have lynched the wrong santa for autoloss
deletedalmost 9 years
ok, they maybe would have lynched in 1/3 for autowin
we wont know.. thats the point, we wont know because he didn't claim his role on day 2
deletedalmost 9 years
i'm still waiting for my refund
deletedalmost 9 years
you guys are making me feelr eally homosexual
deletedalmost 9 years
ok, they maybe would have lynched in 1/3 for autowin
deletedalmost 9 years
the thing is you're making up way too much assumptions in what potentially could've happened if he had claimed,
the fact is they lynched incorrectly in santas without the influence of the un cc'd mafia cop.
If she had asked for crosses and hammered then a refund could be argued but she didn't even give na input on the lynch she just sheeped it.
Saying "If he had claimed and they lynched x then they might have lynched y the next day in a 1/3 lynch which could've probably given autowin" is dumb
they'd have lynched the confirmed fake cop on day 2 and probably would have lynched in blues on day 3 to acquire autowin. you're assuming they'd have lynched santa because "they fos'd him anyway" on d2 which is abhorrent logic. cop claiming on day 2 would have heavily influenced the lynch on that day and changed the entire course of the game.
deletedalmost 9 years
if they lynched right in blues it woulda been autowin
which they weren't likely gonna do
i r r e l e v a n t
talking about lynching right in blues is irrelevant, i'm going with the flow
the fact that you are making me take ian's side on a mafia related discussion is hurting my spirit and i'm just trying to watch law abiding citizen atm
deletedalmost 9 years
if they lynched right in blues it woulda been autowin