deleted almost 10 years
hi lilin
deleted almost 10 years
forum suspended and account suspension is different also thinking I wasn't posting while forum suspended on this account
"meta abuse is "i NEVER kill this person as mafia, and i ALWAYS start days with this line as town, so i cannot be mafia"" So we can now report people who try to meta clear themselves?
deleted almost 10 years
lilinonlyknows says I've never been banned or suspended i can't say the same
deleted almost 10 years
I've never been banned or suspended
deleted almost 10 years
lilinonlyknows says who even cares about being banned anymore, just rename ban to "suspension" prison life seems like it hasn't done you any favors
deleted almost 10 years
Arbre says I guess I really don't see the difference between meta and meta abuse here. It seems very subjective. meta is "arbre plays this way a lot as town, so i think he's town"
meta abuse is "i NEVER kill this person as mafia, and i ALWAYS start days with this line as town, so i cannot be mafia"
deleted almost 10 years
who even cares about being banned anymore, just rename ban to "suspension"
deleted almost 10 years
being banned for cheating didn't stop anyone from getting power neither will meta
I guess I really don't see the difference between meta and meta abuse here. It seems very subjective.
deleted almost 10 years
ban meta, imho tbh.
deleted almost 10 years
meta=/= meta abuse Meta is unavoidable.
deleted almost 10 years
Arbre says What I mean is you're bound to play with some players several times, especially in comped where there are less players. Are you just supposed to ignore meta then? That rule seems very unfair and annoying. You're basically told to ignore useful data. meta is fine, repeatedly using a specific behavior to prove your alignment isn't fine
deleted almost 10 years
that makes sense. i was thinking vio per instance
voluntaryloser says i don't really have a problem with it. it's good that meta abuse is actually on the rules page now. the only part i don't get is why it'd be more lenient than cheating. 4 vios for a ban seems off meta abuse is usually multi-game/established over lots of games. if it's vio-per-game then i can see it being fine
deleted almost 10 years
if you're not talking about guiser then i ain't talkin
deleted almost 10 years
Devante says voluntaryloser says guisetesting is against the rules now? what the ****? what's it called i don't see it they tacked it onto the end of ogi but it's gone now
What I mean is you're bound to play with some players several times, especially in comped where there are less players. Are you just supposed to ignore meta then? That rule seems very unfair and annoying. You're basically told to ignore useful data.
deleted almost 10 years
plus the rule phrasing probably doesn't really capture all of what meta abuse is
voluntaryloser says guisetesting is against the rules now? what the ****? what's it called i don't see it
deleted almost 10 years
i don't really have a problem with it. it's good that meta abuse is actually on the rules page now. the only part i don't get is why it'd be more lenient than cheating. 4 vios for a ban seems off
I'm not talking about guiser at all.
deleted almost 10 years
meta abuse is a problem with or without guiser, guiser is inherently crippled by meta in the first place, and you just cannot ban meta.
deleted almost 10 years
i think he's talking about the meta abuse part