what the hell is this

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

https://epicmafia.com/report/147961 am i going insane? is lynching wrong really worth a violation now?

Satanabout 11 years ago
*puts on suit*

objection
1
Goodbarabout 11 years ago
I'm going to hand this over to my second chair. When I get back, I'd like a word in the quarters with the honorable judge sims
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
mist
So he's already given his explanation as to why he was sure he was lynching mafia but because you know these two happen to be friends and he screwed up autowin you're positive he was throwing?
And do you propose something else?
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
goodbar is a good lawyer
1
deleteddeletedabout 11 years agoedited
Yeah not gonna lie this is an absolutely garbage ruling. You can't give someone a GT vio when they have a perfectly reasonable explanation for their actions "because the person who won is their friend."
11
Goodbarabout 11 years ago
mist
So he's already given his explanation as to why he was sure he was lynching mafia but because you know these two happen to be friends and he screwed up autowin you're positive he was throwing?
remember when the argument was that he should know better? Idio just wants it sustained because he wants him rebanned
roadmanabout 11 years ago
twist
roadman
Build more burrows.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MdQtUSsHfQ
My friend made that. I was actually a tester.

True story.
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
So he's already given his explanation as to why he was sure he was lynching mafia but because you know these two happen to be friends and he screwed up autowin you're positive he was throwing?
deleteddeletedabout 11 years agoedited
roadman
Build more burrows.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MdQtUSsHfQ
Goodbarabout 11 years ago
Idioteque
Goodbar
Idioteque
mist
So is not taking an autowin opportunity automatically throwing even if you're still genuinely attempting to lynch mafia?
He wasn't genuinely attempting to lynch mafia, so no.
What part of he was claiming lb all game and scum outplayed bs by ccing each other do you not get? It was reasonable to think bs was scum
Ah yes, the "No True Scotsman" argument. A personal favorite.
That's cute and all but you need to be a Big Kid and realize he actually fossed the dude for good reasons
roadmanabout 11 years ago
Build more burrows.
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
hey goodbar anthony told me to tell you to play mafia again
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
Goodbar
Idioteque
mist
So is not taking an autowin opportunity automatically throwing even if you're still genuinely attempting to lynch mafia?
He wasn't genuinely attempting to lynch mafia, so no.
What part of he was claiming lb all game and scum outplayed bs by ccing each other do you not get? It was reasonable to think bs was scum
Ah yes, the "No True Scotsman" argument. A personal favorite.
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
mist
Idioteque
mist
So is not taking an autowin opportunity automatically throwing even if you're still genuinely attempting to lynch mafia?
He wasn't genuinely attempting to lynch mafia, so no.
Oh so you're legitimately arguing that he was actually intending to throw the game?
Yes, that's the idea behind sustaining a Gamethrowing violation against him.
Goodbarabout 11 years ago
Idioteque
Goodbar
Idioteque
Goodbar
Idioteque
You want to lynch someone without knowing an autowin mechanic, fine. You don't know about an autowin mechanic and leave your vote on him by accident, sure. You can't have both. Thanks for letting me prove my point that much better.
"Was sure he was maf" does not prove your point. If he thinks the guy is maf, he can't be game throwing because he's trying to play to his wincon
I'm saying he wasn't.
But, like, he didn't know the autowin mechanic and left his vote on on purpose because it was the person he fossed
And it happened to be against a friend of his, someone he plays with regularly, skypes with, and would throw for. I'm glad we had this discussion, Goodbar.
Judge, bias. I ask he recuses himself from this case
Goodbarabout 11 years ago
Idioteque
mist
So is not taking an autowin opportunity automatically throwing even if you're still genuinely attempting to lynch mafia?
He wasn't genuinely attempting to lynch mafia, so no.
What part of he was claiming lb all game and scum outplayed bs by ccing each other do you not get? It was reasonable to think bs was scum
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
Idioteque
mist
So is not taking an autowin opportunity automatically throwing even if you're still genuinely attempting to lynch mafia?
He wasn't genuinely attempting to lynch mafia, so no.
Oh so you're legitimately arguing that he was actually intending to throw the game?
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
Goodbar
Idioteque
Goodbar
Idioteque
You want to lynch someone without knowing an autowin mechanic, fine. You don't know about an autowin mechanic and leave your vote on him by accident, sure. You can't have both. Thanks for letting me prove my point that much better.
"Was sure he was maf" does not prove your point. If he thinks the guy is maf, he can't be game throwing because he's trying to play to his wincon
I'm saying he wasn't.
But, like, he didn't know the autowin mechanic and left his vote on on purpose because it was the person he fossed
And it happened to be against a friend of his, someone he plays with regularly, skypes with, and would throw for. I'm glad we had this discussion, Goodbar.
Goodbarabout 11 years ago
mist
So is not taking an autowin opportunity automatically throwing even if you're still genuinely attempting to lynch mafia?
This. Fhpov he thought he had scum already and didn't understand the mech. This isn't GT
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
mist
So is not taking an autowin opportunity automatically throwing even if you're still genuinely attempting to lynch mafia?
He wasn't genuinely attempting to lynch mafia, so no.
Goodbarabout 11 years ago
Idioteque
Goodbar
Idioteque
You want to lynch someone without knowing an autowin mechanic, fine. You don't know about an autowin mechanic and leave your vote on him by accident, sure. You can't have both. Thanks for letting me prove my point that much better.
"Was sure he was maf" does not prove your point. If he thinks the guy is maf, he can't be game throwing because he's trying to play to his wincon
I'm saying he wasn't.
But, like, he didn't know the autowin mechanic and left his vote on on purpose because it was the person he fossed
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
So is not taking an autowin opportunity automatically throwing even if you're still genuinely attempting to lynch mafia?
deleteddeletedabout 11 years agoedited
At the end of the day, Blister, let's ask where you stand with your leash.
deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago
Goodbar
Idioteque
Blister
Idioteque
I talked it over with Brad and we both agreed that you would and should know better, especially given that your friends were mafia. I can't help but feel disinclined to give you a third chance.
here's some points -

1.) i believed umi claimed bs and then nya was calling umi mafia. this interaction led me to believe they weren't partners
2.) jeffrey claimed last blue a few times
3.) i didn't understand the auto mechanic since i'd never been in that situation before
4.) i was sure he was maf and didn't want to prolong the game if i was just going to vote him anyway
4 is exactly what makes it throwing. You can't have 3 and 4. You want to lynch someone without knowing an autowin mechanic, fine. You don't know about an autowin mechanic and leave your vote on him by accident, sure. You can't have both. Thanks for letting me prove my point that much better.
"Was sure he was maf" does not prove your point. If he thinks the guy is maf, he can't be game throwing because he's trying to play to his wincon
I'm saying he wasn't.
Goodbarabout 11 years ago
Togepi
Goodbar
Togepi
Goodbar
Idioteque
I talked it over with Brad and we both agreed that you would and should know better, especially given that your friends were mafia. I can't help but feel disinclined to give you a third chance.
"Should know better" doesn't prove intent. Humans commit errors, in the real world
True but it proves precedent - the same precedent that players are more inclined to argue when it comes to reports and appeals.
This was a silly statement. He showed no intent whatsoever. The guy he was voting had been claiming lb while there were two other bs claims. He didn't believe scum would cc each other. He didn't understand the auto and didn't have enough time with the chaos to figure out how it worked
You don't think his circlejerk wasn't intent enough?
I myself can circlejerk and also play to win