Round 319 Discussion

Jalebabout 11 years ago

Congratulations to the winners of Round 314!

Good luck to the participants of Round 319!

Join the competition!!

roadmanabout 11 years ago

Go with gay.

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

there's really just so much more information that the mod team has about users that the community doesn't have when it comes to considering who to mod. and most of that information can be vital.

Sanctifyabout 11 years ago

i think you guys are making a big deal out of nothing lol

moonabout 11 years ago

inactive mods were my biggest pet peeve, glad it's not my prob anymore

deleteddeletedabout 11 years agoedited

believe it or not, the admin and mods picking who to mod works pretty well.

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

oh ya i forgot

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

WolfODonnellz

Idioteque
anyway, the point is that modding random users who happen to be popular is going to be a horrendous idea.
Well you gotta mod somoene if your replacing inactives mods so you can't avoid tgat fact

i'm sure if push comes to shove the mod team can find suitable replacements themselves. it's not as if they'e incapable of picking new mods.

roadmanabout 11 years ago

belovedprincess

Idioteque
anyway, the point is that modding random users who happen to be popular is going to be a horrendous idea.
isn't harrold the most recent person to have been modded? does that not look like a popularity contest to u? quality of rulings in reports matters most to the people submitting the reports. friends aren't going to be so huge an influence, it's pretty dumb and knee-jerk anti-social to think they will

What? I'm not a mod.

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

no offense btw, harrold. no slight on u that u got modded for being popular

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

Idioteque

anyway, the point is that modding random users who happen to be popular is going to be a horrendous idea.

Well you gotta mod somoene if your replacing inactives mods so you can't avoid tgat fact

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

i mean the truth of the matter is modding isn't a herculean task.

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

moon

Idioteque
anyway, the point is that modding random users who happen to be popular is going to be a horrendous idea.
not defending it but it didn't go too terrible after chris modded a bunch of random people

kenny got OT'd a bunch, nillager was better put as a sandbox mod, iJacob was a nightmare, and everyone else has been OK. that's like a 50% success rate.

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

Idioteque

anyway, the point is that modding random users who happen to be popular is going to be a horrendous idea.

isn't harrold the most recent person to have been modded? does that not look like a popularity contest to u? quality of rulings in reports matters most to the people submitting the reports. friends aren't going to be so huge an influence, it's pretty dumb and knee-jerk anti-social to think they will

roadmanabout 11 years ago

moon

Idioteque
anyway, the point is that modding random users who happen to be popular is going to be a horrendous idea.
not defending it but it didn't go too terrible after chris modded a bunch of random people

Where was the justice for Satan though?

moonabout 11 years ago

Idioteque

anyway, the point is that modding random users who happen to be popular is going to be a horrendous idea.

not defending it but it didn't go too terrible after chris modded a bunch of random people

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

Idioteque

i read sandbox chat and got an ulcer from you

i read your forum posts and seize on the spot

roadmanabout 11 years ago

A car is just an idea.

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

anyway, the point is that modding random users who happen to be popular is going to be a horrendous idea.

Sanctifyabout 11 years ago

i'd probably just walk, or take the bus

moonabout 11 years ago

mist

moon
mist
inactive at moderating =/= bad at moderating
half of being a good mod is being active
honestly i'd rather have someone who is an effective moderator for a month or two and then peters out and goes inactive than someone who stays relatively active for a long period of time but is bad straight up bad at the job.

I wouldn't want either after the first goes inactive

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

i mean, i'd rather have a car that goes 15 mph than one that has poor alignment and hits everything in sight.

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

belovedprincess

pretty much everything u said there is ready-refuted in the other thread

riot's responses don't count also i didn't read it.

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

moon

mist
inactive at moderating =/= bad at moderating
half of being a good mod is being active

honestly i'd rather have someone who is an effective moderator for a month or two and then peters out and goes inactive than someone who stays relatively active for a long period of time but is bad straight up bad at the job.

moonabout 11 years ago

sure

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

Plot twist jonsnow's idea which nearly got trough