I was visiting a friend in jail one time (he was getting out in about a week) and I asked him if there was anything he wanted me to tell his fiance for him and he said "tell her to get ready for sucky sucky"
First off you don't ever tell someone to get ready and "sucky sucky". That's total disrespect and sexist. Women aren't here for the pleasure for men (solely). We have feelings, emotions, and we are also human (like man). How would a guy like it if I told him the opposite? "get ready to get on your knees" or something that was equally inappropriate? He'd probably say something in reply "female dog please. who you talking to like that?" Which is also....sexist and anti-feministic.
deletedover 9 years
i still remember the dle who told me to kill myself after both running on TEO and him taking my silver by a couple of points, what a barrel of laughs that was
deletedover 9 years
dle matured a lot while in college, it's a strange yet gratifying feeling
How is my statement in anyway shape or form delusional or self-gratifying? Your argument makes makes no logical sense. You say im wrong then counter your own argument by explaining the diminishing returns of money, which are in fact true? Social connections in life are far more indicative of happiness in life than money. Monks spend their lives surrounded by people with similar beliefs and making social connections with them, which helps their happiness. They are in no way shape or form emotionless. On that note, you can measure happiness. It matters not if its "subjective". Using a subjective scale to measure it works just fine.
seems like ever since i made the comment declaring sons disposable because of all the other shitposters, they all showed up to prove how superior they are to sons.
except khnm who has a real life and doesn't care. probably shouldn't have included him in that list.
Stopped trying to wade through Butt Crack Creek about two sentences in but Sirius is right assuming he's saying money equals happiness.
deletedover 9 years
this is generally a very delusional, self-gratifying point of view imo. it's actually incredibly complicated to say what equals happiness, and the diminishing returns that come from greater and greater wealth accumulation can hardly be touted as proof of money not equaling happiness. i mean, hey, maybe the diminishing returns are because money brought a 'peak happiness', no? didn't think of that, did you? the only thing that's actually really there, imo, is that things get stale, which might reduce happiness over time, or perhaps that the feeling of victory in greater wealth accumulation might fade over time, which is also, in fairness, a big one, being that we and our self-administered emotions are largely just the process, largely just the journey and its intermediary rewards, bound for another place ... but what a pity to finally have won? honestly, i'd say, for most people, money is actually equal to happiness; but not that most people don't live insanely, either. them buddhists actually probably have it right in a large way, crafting a sort of emotionlessness. or maybe it's actually family and living and reliving a bunch of lives in one. and outlook also plays hugely into happiness too. i dunno. money's definitely happiness for most people tho. and sex with it. don't be sold bullsh*t u want to believe just because it comes under the brand 'science' bro.
