Sirius says

dle9999 says

Yeah uhh I'm done with this conversation. That was just painful to read.

at least i'm not a walking contradiction.

I cant even understand what you wrote. It's not English.

dle9999 says

Yeah uhh I'm done with this conversation. That was just painful to read.

at least i'm not a walking contradiction.

I am definitely the best at what I do

Sirius, come play mafia.

Yeah uhh I'm done with this conversation. That was just painful to read.

dle9999 says

Sirius says

this is generally a very delusional, self-gratifying point of view imo. it's actually incredibly complicated to say what equals happiness, and the diminishing returns that come from greater and greater wealth accumulation can hardly be touted as proof of money not equaling happiness. i mean, hey, maybe the diminishing returns are because money brought a 'peak happiness'....

How is my statement in anyway shape or form delusional or self-gratifying? Your argument makes makes no logical sense. You say im wrong then counter your own argument by explaining the diminishing returns of money, which are in fact true? Social connections in life are far more indicative of happiness in life than money. Monks spend their lives surrounded by people with similar beliefs and making social connections with them, which helps their happiness. They are in no way shape or form emotionless. On that note, you can measure happiness. It matters not if its "subjective". Using a subjective scale to measure it works just fine.

u misunderstood then. i wasn't citing the diminishing returns of wealth accumulation so as to prop up your argument, but rather targeting them as the key piece of evidence in ur case. they just don't prove anything, but scientists are still happy to cry from the rooftops that money is a dead-end because of them, and the majority of people are happy to believe that, because it allows them to feel equal to the wealthy. really, in general, wealth probably does equal happiness; that's just the obvious truth of it. and it's funny, actually, because ur belief, if it is delusion as it is with so many people, is actually just another sort of wealth, basically just social competition. wealth and iq bro, nobody poor of either wants to believe they're worth anything.

wtf how is this sexist to say this to your partner

Sirius says

this is generally a very delusional, self-gratifying point of view imo. it's actually incredibly complicated to say what equals happiness, and the diminishing returns that come from greater and greater wealth accumulation can hardly be touted as proof of money not equaling happiness. i mean, hey, maybe the diminishing returns are because money brought a 'peak happiness'....

How is my statement in anyway shape or form delusional or self-gratifying? Your argument makes makes no logical sense. You say im wrong then counter your own argument by explaining the diminishing returns of money, which are in fact true? Social connections in life are far more indicative of happiness in life than money. Monks spend their lives surrounded by people with similar beliefs and making social connections with them, which helps their happiness. They are in no way shape or form emotionless. On that note, you can measure happiness. It matters not if its "subjective". Using a subjective scale to measure it works just fine.

First off you don't ever tell someone to get ready and "sucky sucky". That's total disrespect and sexist. Women aren't here for the pleasure for men (solely). We have feelings, emotions, and we are also human (like man). How would a guy like it if I told him the opposite? "get ready to get on your knees" or something that was equally inappropriate? He'd probably say something in reply "female dog please. who you talking to like that?" Which is also....sexist and anti-feministic.

i still remember the dle who told me to kill myself after both running on TEO and him taking my silver by a couple of points, what a barrel of laughs that was