The previous mods used to allow new setups even if they arent tested and unadjusted for points as long as they look decent enough. What the mods are doing right now discourages discovery of new setups that have comp-potential and encourages competitive mafia to revolve repetitively around the old setups that have already been tested.
bell it's all your fault that robert's backup choice was Jan 2.0
#frickthemods
Actually, it is the mods fault that they de comped all of the other setups
#modsrthefrickers
Laugh all you want, but I've come to dislike this administration more than any other. I seriously can't believe you guys can have so much disregard for your own rules and just act impulsively as you see fit (unless it suits you otherwise). You're (plural, sorry to the few good mods out there) making me wish pranay was admin so he could fix all the messes you're making. And that's sad if you ask me
Anywho sorry about not letting stbs get comped I didn't realize that it was sensitive to the # of plays the setup had in previous rounds, as I wasn't there when they made that rule.
decent point considering that they aren't point-farms if they are ridiculously scumsided and unadjusted for points. to be fair though, the precedent for what qualifies as a comp worthy setup is murky...
I am not against comping jan2.0 but I'm against the mods using their power to influence what gets comp. Srsly. No one's going to play those scumhunt setups anyway, why not just keep them there so the winners have the satisfaction that what they want (and not what the mods want) got comped.