This isn't a matter of opinion. This is literally a matter of him saying "I think that the two town is mafia. Your reasons for voting the mafia are awful.".
apple and newjersey don't seem to realize the point of forums
deletedabout 10 years
nicole only complains because people are taking her boyfriend to task.
deletedabout 10 years
arguing that things are (being) done right doesn't hurt anyone and actually this type of discussion is good for the most part as long as it remains objective
deletedabout 10 years
arguing that things are (being) done right doesn't hurt anyone and actually this type of discussion is good for the most part as long as it remains objective
deletedabout 10 years
again, youre arguing about a virtual trophy on an online mafia game.
sit down.
one you'd be going crazy over if it were you. maybe be impartial instead of backing up pjm when you literally havent read the game. maybe, we shouldn't care about cheaters/gamethowers etc too
the game i reported was anyone's game. mafia or town could have won it, until someone made it so town couldn't win it. it's a very simple concept, really. applies to most thrown games, in fact. it's not a difficult concept
Okay, so now that you realize that Calvin's game was actually a town loss, you're ignoring it. Cool.
no i'm not. what i said still applies. you disagreed with it, and i don't care. who he voted post-blitz is a pretty good indicator of who he was going to vote pre-blitz. i'm not going to be cynical and assume calvin was lying about his intent to vote mafia, unlike you, i guess. that's a differ of opinion that you are infact wrong on
i dont know why the town's intention or how they were playing is factoring in on a refund that should be based solely on the behavior of the person given the violation
newpage
deletedabout 10 years
i think the people worse than those addressing issues are the ones complaining about those people
MUST >>>>>>>>>>> WIN>>>>>>>>>>>>THE>>>>>>>>>>BRONZE
deletedabout 10 years
i dont know why the town's intention or how they were playing is factoring in on a refund that should be based solely on the behavior of the person given the violation
deletedabout 10 years
Polo mremmet is confirmed town to me
Polo outs a read on mafia
deletedabout 10 years
akira self voted @ kicks + mafia blitzed, appleofmyeye. read the game
the game i reported was anyone's game. mafia or town could have won it, until someone made it so town couldn't win it. it's a very simple concept, really. applies to most thrown games, in fact. it's not a difficult concept
Okay, so now that you realize that Calvin's game was actually a town loss, you're ignoring it. Cool.
As far as your game goes, the town had been playing a pretty subpar game the entire time, and I don't see any indication that they would have won otherwise.
It's not a matter of it "being not autowin", it's just a matter of the town failing and showing no signs of recovery. Someone making a choice that makes them fail for sure does not mean that a refund is in order.
deletedabout 10 years
it doesn't matter if mafia would have won or whatever because theres no way of telling, but personally i think the reason akira was lynched was because of the isp.. causing a loss. either way it caused the loss so i agree it should be refunded but
everyone just chill the hell out
youre arguing over 60 points on an online mafia game
the game i reported was anyone's game. mafia or town could have won it, until someone made it so town couldn't win it. it's a very simple concept, really. applies to most thrown games, in fact. it's not a difficult concept
he literally gave up and self-voted as both town voted the mafia and i didnt need to read the 30-something minute day to realize that
Which game are you referring to? You do need to read the full game to understand context, and what games actually require a refund. You can PM me if you wanna discuss it further.