Tell General Howard I know his heart. What he told me before, I have it in my heart. I am tired of fighting. Our Chiefs are killed; Looking Glass is dead, Ta Hool Hool Shute is dead. The old men are all dead. It is the young men who say yes or no. He who led on the young men is dead. It is cold, and we have no blankets; the little children are freezing to death. My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food. No one knows where they are - perhaps freezing to death. I want to have time to look for my children, and see how many of them I can find. Maybe I shall find them among the dead. Hear me, my Chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands I will fight no more forever.
im not asking you to remove it. im just saying that avis have a persona. you profile people based on avis. your avi with a light blue background and a confused bunny with one ear dropping gives a trollish look. and the name literally sucks.
Are you saying names like MooCow are better, or you are saying the avatar of a bunny is a bad one? Do you seriously think i want to have something no one likes on this site as an avatar? I am doing a favour for my friend who made this avatar 5 years ago. I wont remove it only because you say.
But i really think it was stupid of me.. It pretty much looks like begging from my side, but thats all im capable of doing. Unless i have connections, begging will never help me.
I am trully saying, that the only way to be head admin is to have as much connections as possible.
I promised to say the truth and only the truth Ediz. Ask Lucid, i did send him few messages, of me asking to be head admin. It is not a lie. Im coming clear in front of everyone, sicne its eating me from the inside.
Ah well, if you want all to know, i PM'ed Lucid to make me head admin right after bronto left..
I really wanted a position, so i to feel important to the site, and actually have a voice. There are things i want to do.. but i can not since many accept me as a troll, rather than a honest person.
For today im going to tell only the truth and this is it. I really want to have a postion on this site, rather to just play and be always annoyed that if i say something bad at the admins they will just act bad in return....
If i was in equal footing in them, they would not act bad ( some of them) when i try to tell them they are wrong.
proper mechanics of third party can fix it and make it ok for competition. jointing dilutes your points and thus its ok for competition. for people deciding who wins, we have a rule for kingmakers. also if u are playing in the wrong table, then you are responsible for your loss. one cant win a competition with help from 3rd parties, but if one is not good enough to avoid losses because of it, then one is not made for winning.
no one gets any unfair advantage in the long run, because everybody happens to be in that situation for the same amount of time. if someone has more friends who helps them, then we have mods to keep track of them. even people who dont have friends win a lot. rather third party setups provide scope for a diff kind of skill set. every once in a while we can see who is good with third party setups. only the winners win. losers whine and say setups are bad
well it is something you influenced. Because you could avoid the n1 death if you are in the right table. if maf thinks doc will be on u, then maf wont kill u. if there is no doc and u play it and there is a player who might n1 u, then you must know who is most likely to be maf if you are n1d. well if your mind works as fast as it should, then you will understand how your n1 death depends on what you do on this site.
Townsiding as fool/lyncher is something that should have never been created, choosing not to joint as killer is perfectly legitimate. The N1 loss is exactly the same as any other N1 loss or win. Anytime you die N1 it is unfair even if you win or lose because it's not something you influenced
3rd party setups are bad for competition because it enables people to really easily throw against people they don't like while still playing towards their win condition, like townsiding as fool/lyncher or choosing not to joint as killer. It becomes a lot of "haha I played suboptimally and took less points so you wouldn't get any". or "hahaha i made a really risky play to ensure you lost and practically removing all chances I would win to make that happen hahahaha". Not to mention as a 3rd party that can only win alone, you can have a 0% chance of winning if you get N1'd, which is extremely unfair.
Either way it's up to Vancy now - it's his lobby and he can run it how he likes, although I think the arguments against 3rd parties in comp are stronger than the pro-3rd parties and I hope it continues to be run that way.
Also, as far as naysayers go, Vancy doesn't strike me as the type to do anything corrupt or for his friends' benefit at the expense of the community - things will only end badly if the community drives him up a wall. I'm confident he'll do a great job of keeping things running smoothly. He's got a great team behind him too. I wouldn't be worried. I'll be rooting for him.
I'll have you guys know Vancy is already hard at work. His first order of business is one we've been longing for. He's going to finally Make Admin Forum Viable!
"There are the flexible guidelines of attributes commonly seen in competitively viable setups, and it certainly isn’t law"
That thread was bronto just being bronto. Third parties were never actually banned. Riot comped SK vs Maf not long ago. You can also have more than 10 player games. There are some rules there though, so it's confusing. Always hated that thread cuz it implied things but every time I complained someone would just quote the certainly isn't law part
Stepping Down as Admin
