Yeah there's a very strong moral case for choosing adoption over procreation but I'll probably ignore it
this is in general discussion 4 a reason please discuss
I don't think the human species should necessarily be phased out but the human population needs to decrease. Hence adoption being good. I'm also a big fan of eugenics and infanticide but you can't say that in public without people jumping down your throat before you get the chance to lay out your arguments. Also I'm too lazy to lay out my arguments. Peter Singer says it all anyway w.r.t. infanticide.
well emmer using deductive reasoning i'm assuming you meant victims of non-consensual intercourse.
Yeah I was.
Interesting. What would be interesting to see is whether sexual offences were reduced with the increase of vasectomies (whether the 'biological urge' to have intercourse would be reduced) - some claim that many offenders of this type 'can't help it' and have diagnosable conditions where the urge (either for intercourse or reproduction) overwhelms the concious mind (and our knowledge of right and wrong).
Have there been any studies/research done in populations where this is a thing? I'd love to see the crime rates as well as other things.
in game of thrones people who become eunuchs have no sex drive whatsoever.
well emmer using deductive reasoning i'm assuming you meant victims of non-consensual intercourse.
Yeah I was.
Interesting. What would be interesting to see is whether sexual offences were reduced with the increase of vasectomies (whether the 'biological urge' to have intercourse would be reduced) - some claim that many offenders of this type 'can't help it' and have diagnosable conditions where the urge (either for intercourse or reproduction) overwhelms the concious mind (and our knowledge of right and wrong).
Have there been any studies/research done in populations where this is a thing? I'd love to see the crime rates as well as other things.
for reasons i dont understand myself + possibly a ~fear~ i wouldn't connect as well
the only way you wouldn't connect as well would be if you didn't let yourself connect as well.
parents who put babies up for adoption usually do it because the babies are unwanted in some way. the very fact that you adopted that baby, means you wanted them.
its just not that simple
actually, in a vacuum, it is that simple. hormones are only a catalyst to paternal bonding
for reasons i dont understand myself + possibly a ~fear~ i wouldn't connect as well
the only way you wouldn't connect as well would be if you didn't let yourself connect as well.
parents who put babies up for adoption usually do it because the babies are unwanted in some way. the very fact that you adopted that baby, means you wanted them.
for reasons i dont understand myself + possibly a ~fear~ i wouldn't connect as well
the only way you wouldn't connect as well would be if you didn't let yourself connect as well.
parents who put babies up for adoption usually do it because the babies are unwanted in some way. the very fact that you adopted that baby, means you wanted them.