Back to Complaints

2 things

Mouths
over 6 years

  1. mw295 and his report spam fetish, hes becoming like bsm. He goes to reports and threatens people with report spam if they don't stop talking in the comments when people are arguing something. He is using this to hush people into silence on reports when I'm pretty sure the use for it isn't to stop people from discussing in comments but to not allow people to spam actual spam in the comments. its actually very ridiculous and it needs to stop

  2. a 3 month note is basically a violation it lasts the same amount of time as grs, isp, trolling, ogi, HC, and even longer than spamming, copied mechanics, ERB. this is silly because it creates a situation where i rather get the spamming vio then the note because it lasts longer

stop arguing

Mike
over 6 years

SteelixMega says

yeah fk the police for ensuring our freedoms are protected. fk the police for being humans who make mistakes. fk the police for shooting non-whites.


Primary job of any department run by the government is to ensure that they're making their budget back from the populace that they serve.


SteelixMega says

fk the police for ensuring our freedoms are protected


This is idealism you grew up with. This is not an actual function of reality.

SteelixMega says



another brainwashed person who doesn't know how to think or use Google.

Mike
over 6 years

blacksnakemoan says

Woops, never mind, you can't even be considerate of a woman murdered by a neo naz`i (is filtered lol wtf?).


The first person hit by the driver was a black man who promptly get the fk up and out of the way. Even so he was still the headline of the local paper.
Mike
over 6 years

blacksnakemoan says


Mike says

It's funny watching BSM support one racist organization in favor of another.


If you want to participate at least make sure your sentences make sense.


2nd time you've pretended to lack reading comprehension skills when I point out your hypocrisy. In case you were wondering, deleting the second part instead of responding while making your comment is just about as disingenuous as you can be in this situation.
MisterPresident
over 6 years

SteelixMega says

This statement implying that police are trying to shoot black people is completely preposterous, and disregarding the real facts.


I think you're correct that 99.9% of police officers aren't TRYING to shoot (black) people, but there are numerous psychological studies outlining cross-race effects, internalized racism, etc. that show evidence for inherent biases. For example, even if not conscious, white people tend to generally unconsciously prefer other white people as opposed to someone who is black.

This is a major issue when someone in power is able to make life or death judgement calls. Most cops are fine people, but they still unconsciously struggle with unconscious racism (whether shaped because of biological reasons, social reasons, both).
MisterPresident
over 6 years

blacksnakemoan says


MisterPresident says

Scenario 1: "What do you guys call it when someone drives a car through a crowd of protestors and kills one?'"

I actually read this wrong, assuming you meant a group of ANTIFA "protesters" blocking the road/causing havoc. Then there would be other reasons besides terrorism that someone tries to drive through the crowd.




Dude, I'm not trying to trick you with hypotheticals. I'm talking about Charlottesville and the man who has a record of white supremacist and neo- behaviour driving his car into people protesting a racist hate group.


MisterPresident says

Scenario 2: "Or when a mob of white men with flaming torches gather around a statue commemorating slavery and a war which was fought to keep white supremacy enshrined in law?"

This isn't terrorism, IMO. This is hateful, attempting to spread hate, and dangerous, but not terrorism. It isn't violence. Inciting terror? Maybe. But stupid people have stupid beliefs, and until they attempt to terrorize people directly, they're technically allowed


It's intimidation for political means???


Scenario 1: Yeah, definitely terrorism.

Scenario 2: If they were just standing around a statue, only discussing with themselves, they're /technically/ allowed to do that. The second they start harassing people of color, attacking anyone, etc. then it is terrorism. Is it still wrong? Yes, but not terrorism by the example you gave
SteelixMega
over 6 years

blacksnakemoan says

1. none of that is terrorism

2. the current US government is fascist - see: child abductions at border; government attacks on press; racially discriminative policies - and the police are their representatives on the ground.

3. the US police are a militarised and racist organisation in their own right - see symbols carved on police equipment; shootings of non-white Americans by police w/o prosecution.

reminder that antifa haven't killed anyone but literal nazis killed a woman in charlottesville


yeah fk the police for ensuring our freedoms are protected. fk the police for being humans who make mistakes. fk the police for shooting non-whites.


Are you effing stupid bro?

When someone calls the cops, they don't call cuz a black person is doing something, they call because there is a crime that happened. Police don't respond to calls just because people are not white.

Also, the shooting per race is proportional to the amount of crimes per race. White people are shot more than black people by police in America. It is more likely for black people to shoot each other in a homicide than a cop shoots a black man. And it is more likely for people in America to die from gun suicide and not gun homicide. This statement implying that police are trying to shoot black people is completely preposterous, and disregarding the real facts.
SteelixMega
over 6 years

blacksnakemoan says

1. none of that is terrorism

2. the current US government is fascist - see: child abductions at border; government attacks on press; racially discriminative policies - and the police are their representatives on the ground.

3. the US police are a militarised and racist organisation in their own right - see symbols carved on police equipment; shootings of non-white Americans by police w/o prosecution.

reminder that antifa haven't killed anyone but literal nazis killed a woman in charlottesville


it isn't antifa vs. nazīs idiot. It is America vs Anti-American ideals. The whole thing about how "if you don't support antifa, you support nazzy" is projection, and America is already anti-fascist and anti-nazzy. We don't need groups like antifa to make the concept of anti-fascism look bad.
SteelixMega
over 6 years

blacksnakemoan says

1. none of that is terrorism

2. the current US government is fascist - see: child abductions at border; government attacks on press; racially discriminative policies - and the police are their representatives on the ground.

3. the US police are a militarised and racist organisation in their own right - see symbols carved on police equipment; shootings of non-white Americans by police w/o prosecution.

reminder that antifa haven't killed anyone but literal nazis killed a woman in charlottesville


lmao really? Scaring people on to your side is literally what terrorism is, if you couldn't already tell by the word terror.
SteelixMega
over 6 years

blacksnakemoan says

1. none of that is terrorism

2. the current US government is fascist - see: child abductions at border; government attacks on press; racially discriminative policies - and the police are their representatives on the ground.

3. the US police are a militarised and racist organisation in their own right - see symbols carved on police equipment; shootings of non-white Americans by police w/o prosecution.

reminder that antifa haven't killed anyone but literal nazis killed a woman in charlottesville


fascism noun
fas·cism | \ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi- \
Definition of fascism
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control

bsm is another brainwashed person who doesn't know how to think or use Google.
SteelixMega
over 6 years

Maldito says


Mike says


blacksnakemoan says

What do you guys call it when someone drives a car through a crowd of protestors and kills one?'


Darwinism seeing as she was the only one to die, but not the only one hit.



WHAT THE FÜCK LOL


LMFAO what did I just read?
mandevian
over 6 years
I see we are still using door knobs as moderators.
Songin
over 6 years

Alex says

yo did zovea really just suggest that the reason that protester lady deserved to die was due to her evolutionary disadvantages in accepting impact from a car

zovea rules yall im so glad hes back


T Types know best.
Alex
over 6 years
hes so fcking cool i love him
Maldito
over 6 years

Mike says


blacksnakemoan says

What do you guys call it when someone drives a car through a crowd of protestors and kills one?'


Darwinism seeing as she was the only one to die, but not the only one hit.



WHAT THE FÜCK LOL
Alex
over 6 years
yo did zovea really just suggest that the reason that protester lady deserved to die was due to her evolutionary disadvantages in accepting impact from a car

zovea rules yall im so glad hes back
blacksnakemoan
over 6 years

Mike says

It's funny watching BSM support one racist organization in favor of another.


If you want to participate at least make sure your sentences make sense.


Mike says

Darwinism seeing as she was the only one to die, but not the only one hit.


Woops, never mind, you can't even be considerate of a woman murdered by a neo naz`i (is filtered lol wtf?).
blacksnakemoan
over 6 years

MisterPresident says

Scenario 1: "What do you guys call it when someone drives a car through a crowd of protestors and kills one?'"

I actually read this wrong, assuming you meant a group of ANTIFA "protesters" blocking the road/causing havoc. Then there would be other reasons besides terrorism that someone tries to drive through the crowd.




Dude, I'm not trying to trick you with hypotheticals. I'm talking about Charlottesville and the man who has a record of white supremacist and neo- behaviour driving his car into people protesting a racist hate group.


MisterPresident says

Scenario 2: "Or when a mob of white men with flaming torches gather around a statue commemorating slavery and a war which was fought to keep white supremacy enshrined in law?"

This isn't terrorism, IMO. This is hateful, attempting to spread hate, and dangerous, but not terrorism. It isn't violence. Inciting terror? Maybe. But stupid people have stupid beliefs, and until they attempt to terrorize people directly, they're technically allowed


It's intimidation for political means???
Mike
over 6 years

blacksnakemoan says

What do you guys call it when someone drives a car through a crowd of protestors and kills one?'


Darwinism seeing as she was the only one to die, but not the only one hit.

Also presuming that the person in the car wasn't being attacked and trying to flee above any political motivation that led them there in the first place.
Mike
over 6 years
It's funny watching BSM support one racist organization in favor of another. Especially an organization whose sole purpose is to show up where people are standing for something and start a riot.
MisterPresident
over 6 years

blacksnakemoan says


MisterPresident says

well actually by definition not terrorism but just as bad


both of the things i described would fall under violence or intimidation being used in support of political aims though, so how is it not terrorism?

I'd say that some members of Antifa have engaged in terrorist tactics, just like some supporters of Trump have engaged in terrorist tactics, but I wouldn't say that all supporters of Trump or all members of Antifa are terrorists. Just like you wouldn't call all Muslims terrorists based on the actions of ISIS.


Scenario 1: "What do you guys call it when someone drives a car through a crowd of protestors and kills one?'"

I actually read this wrong, assuming you meant a group of ANTIFA "protesters" blocking the road/causing havoc. Then there would be other reasons besides terrorism that someone tries to drive through the crowd.

Scenario 2: "Or when a mob of white men with flaming torches gather around a statue commemorating slavery and a war which was fought to keep white supremacy enshrined in law?"

This isn't terrorism, IMO. This is hateful, attempting to spread hate, and dangerous, but not terrorism. It isn't violence. Inciting terror? Maybe. But stupid people have stupid beliefs, and until they attempt to terrorize people directly, they're technically allowed
Bebop
over 6 years
how many months on and people still dont know how not to get baited in complaints forums
blacksnakemoan
over 6 years

MisterPresident says

well actually by definition not terrorism but just as bad


both of the things i described would fall under violence or intimidation being used in support of political aims though, so how is it not terrorism?

I'd say that some members of Antifa have engaged in terrorist tactics, just like some supporters of Trump have engaged in terrorist tactics, but I wouldn't say that all supporters of Trump or all members of Antifa are terrorists. Just like you wouldn't call all Muslims terrorists based on the actions of ISIS.
denial
over 6 years
i wouldn't actually go so far as to say ANTIFA are terrorists but the argument of trying to refute what he was referencing as not terrorism is wrong

its by definition terrorism and thats why I thought you were widely uninformed that what they're doing is just organizing protests

i hope you're not arguing that anything misterpresident said would fall under as just "organizing protests"

stating that ANTIFA havent killed anyone is also very misleading. i'm sure you're not trying to argue that because they haven't killed anyone, their actions dont fall under terrorism

so going to end with:

what reasoning do you have to argue that ANTIFA havent engaged in acts of terrorism?

is it because you think it would be silly to call me a terrorist if i went around assaulting everybody that is a trump supporter?
MisterPresident
over 6 years
well actually by definition not terrorism but just as bad
MisterPresident
over 6 years
Also terrorism