exploit abuse / grs d1 after majority vote was on him; he knew the game would glitch since there was a sniper, so it gave the suicide penalty to the next person although he left first
While it sucks that London got their first sui because they didn't realize the game was still ranked, it's not my fault that they are unaware of mechanics.
You can't argue that I GRS'd since I did not even receive a suicide.
You also cannot argue that I abused an exploit when:
1. This is a purposeful feature that does not break the game, as evidenced by the games I have linked.
2. There is no stated rule anywhere on the site that one can't exit the game when all votes are cast and the majority of votes are on them when they know that this does not cause the game to go unranked.
deletedabout 7 years
Here's a game that shows that suicide mechanics work as I've said:
In this game, all votes were cast. The majority of the votes were on me. Sniper had not yet shot or NL'd their gun. When I exited the game, votes were locked, but once the sniper NL'd their gun, the game proceeded as usual. The game remained ranked.
Here's another example of a comp game where someone exited the game with all votes on them and the game went on and remained ranked:
Considering London and I were the same alignment and town was not in autoloss (since it was D1), there's little reason to think that I was purposefully trying to make the game go unranked.
deletedabout 7 years
Suiciding with all votes cast and a majority of votes on you does not count as a suicide. The game simply continues as though the person had been lynched, and remains ranked. It's not a glitch, but an actual feature intended to prevent GRS. In cases with a sniper, once the sniper either shoots or NLs gun, the game goes to night. That's why London got the vio.
ErzaScarIet