This is my third attempt at creating a forum mafia game, I have decided that the previous ones have not received enough participation and hope that this one will.
If you decide to join please note that a mandatory 50 posts will be required within a 24 hour period. If I do not see that level of participation i will replace you.
Because I fos you and I'm not convinced? That doesn't make me an ... I don't need to townread you, especially when you refuse to explain how you've towntold.
In their right mind? Not everyone has your mindset, and it's easier for people to get an idea of what you're talking about by explaining it. It's not hard to go back or even just say it, you should already have an idea about how you've towntold.
i think i've towntold with my posts lmao anyone in their right mind would be able to read it
and yes i'm requiring other people to do the searching because i spent time on those posts so they should read them
That's basically letting others decide your fate.
lmaoooooo isn't that the whole idea of lynching i don't decide whether im lynched or not so instead i use my words to convince other people to decide not to lynch me that is how mafia works
Saying 'think' is interesting itself, because it kinda shows that you yourself are unsure of that. And also, you're requiring others to do the searching, whether than telling others how you've towntold... Hmm...
ok lied about last post but this sh*t is here for everyone else to read and i think i've towntold so i guess we'll just wait for everyone else's opinion
I would, but you haven't given me any reason, instead you made me a lot more suspicious. So, yeah, I'm not gonna back now, because atm, you are my biggest scumread.
i don't feel like spending time on these posts has gotten me anywhere and im getting really annoyed by the fact that you're literally refusing to step back and reconsider and somehow every attempt i make to towntell makes you scumread me even more
last post of the night
1. i stopped digging into your reads on the previous and we are now having the dialogue -i really only 'pointed out the flaws' yesterday because i needed to explain WHY i called you hypocritical
2. 'arguing' over the same townread means u discuss WHY you made that read. there's a chance that we are both wrong and so discussing the basis of the read helps you decide whether it is a strong read or not
Starting a dialogue as town to another town is honestly worthless to me. [...] you just want to point out flaws in my reading, which doesn't get us anywhere. If you want to help town, it's better to focus on people that are suspicious
this is where we disagree then
IMO having a town-town dialogue lets you bounce reads off of each other and get feedback
also i initially started this dialogue because i thought you were suspicious so idk what the problem with it is
But we aren't bouncing back and forth, you're just digging into my reads and continuously explaining why they're weak. It's reasonable for me to do that, because I don't see you as town, but for you, it's just pointless. You'd be better off going into your own reads, and I don't feel like you're actually taking my own reads into consideration.
I'm gonna also say I think Poser is town. I like the content of her posts, and the way she was getting frustrated (unless you weren't?) over people derailing the conversation. It felt genuine
Starting a dialogue as town to another town is honestly worthless to me. [...] you just want to point out flaws in my reading, which doesn't get us anywhere. If you want to help town, it's better to focus on people that are suspicious
this is where we disagree then
IMO having a town-town dialogue lets you bounce reads off of each other and get feedback
also i initially started this dialogue because i thought you were suspicious so idk what the problem with it is
I mean you townread Mac too, so why are you fighting over this?
ok i literally explained this before, but just the fact that someone agrees with my read doesn't necessarily mean i agree with WHY they read it that way
i think the reasoning behind the read is a lot more telling than the actual read
But where does arguing over a read of the same townread get us anywhere??? Please tell me