After seeing PatricianSalafist99 make a post on the sandbox lobby wall about how a free speech practice was taken off of some campus for talking about how race and IQ have some form of predictability between them or correlation. Allow me to first state why these IQ and race comparisons are always normally inaccurate and then let me explain why at the same time, there is in fact a way to measure the difficult someone will have gaining intelligence based off of the race they are.'

First off, lets define what a race is by Darwins theory of evolution. A race is the optimization of the survival of a species in its environment. This means that being a race on its own is influenced over enough generations, by the environment. This is why many people who are prejudice toward other races try to argue that another race is another species entirely, because their argument would unravel when they say that race dictates more than environment in intelligence. Race is dictated by the environment, meaning that both factors they use as excuses to intelligence are essentially environment. That means one hundred percent environment is dictating someones intelligence and race. No matter how you swing words, you either believe in Darwins theory or you believe in your own theory in terms of race and evolution, which seems to be the case for these pseudo scientist.

I'v had problems with people of other races from other cities, but, in the city I grew up in, not quite so. It always boils down to how they were raised and what they were told in the school they went to. I was told that sticks and stones can break my bones but words will never hurt me. I was told two wrongs don't make a right and to do on to others as I would want them to do on to me. When someone steals from another person, naturally you may want justice on the person who stole from you; rightful so in fact. When you steal from other people because someone stole from you and the person you stole from isn't the one who stole from you, but, you stole because you have had things stolen, this is a clear case of two wrongs. This is what I always see other people of other backgrounds doing from different cities no matter what race they are, especially if they were indoctrinated to hate others. You want someone to steal from you? Steal from others in that case. You want people to stop stealing from you? Maybe don't steal just because you're a victim. Growing up, I use to get into fights a lot because of my individuality in comparison to the collective of other people. People believe just because they have big numbers that somehow this changes the fact they are incorrect about the assumptions they've made. Doesn't work when you are an individual trying to be a collectivist for a cause that has no power. When I'd get in trouble for fighting, so would other people, but, both parties in the city I came from would be made to believe only they were in trouble. This was a psychological punishment and cruel on many levels, but, these people wanted to get rid of those who took matters into their own hands. It's really hard to say when you defended yourself that you were taking matters into your own hands because you didn't really have a choice at that moment, but, as was the case many times for myself. I never went out and beat somebody up because they tried to fight me before. This is what makes people from different backgrounds so different than the majority in most countries. Minorities in any country, which don't have to be black, but, can also be white, normally don't get the best of education or the highest quality of filters in their lives. This is why minorities no matter where you go are going to have to either grow up and accept the cards they were given, or try to cheat and end up in the same place many people before them have ended up as society was designed to put them there.

Second off, physiology also plays a huge role in the intelligence gap between people, as well as resources they have available to them. An example of this would be people from the middle east that live in the desert have to store food and water in their bodies, thus, produce adenazine. Many prejudice people don't actual care about these arguments and never attempt to give these possibilities a chance that other chemicals produced naturally in somebodies brain could play a key factor in behavior. This is because it's really easy to blame a person and not as easy to blame the reasons that person would have. It's a very beast like assumption made by most prejudice people because it's the easiest thing to do with a primitive mind. So if a middle eastern is producing adenazine, they might like coffee as it counteracts the chemical. Look at the Turkish. Really makes you think doesn't it? As a species optimizes to its environment and creates what we know as a race, it's clear the same chemical make up of someone else of a different race obviously isn't going to be the same, or else their skin color would be as well.

To accept any of this as true, you'd have to accept the environment plays the largest role in the matter and that the more primative minds are likely to blame the identity of a person, especially in an age when identity only barely exist which is why so many people can steal each others identity, hell maybe even DNA soon. So everybody of other races could be systematically put in liminality together and of course there will be criminals. You don't burn a whole forest down because there are a lot of dead trees when there is still useful wood in there because any civilization greater than our own would do the same to us, meaning we would all be killed and none of this would matter. Didn't you stupid Christians who bastardize Darwins theory believe in Jesus Christ? Doesn't that mean you believe in the as above so below? Like I said, the actual animals are those who behave as such and attack other people and forget that civilization exist which bonds us together without having to kill each other. This devolution back to the old ways doesn't work well for those who feel threatened and attack the so called minority, because their environment has optimized them to be superior when society fails them, especially one ran by people who are lazy and unable.

The founding fathers were completely different than the people in charge today. The people in charge today of our society act no different than the British acted before America declared its independence from Britain ironically enough, extremely corrupt and genocidal, needing to parasite off other peoples culture and countries to survive. If you are a parasite, do you think you are superior just because you have a group of parasites to back you up? You still depend on others. You aren't an individual and fake it till you make it.

Anyway, thank you for listening.