Here is your chance to grade your mods (and admin). You can pick your grading criteria, but I suggest to factor in the following: activity, report verdict accuracy, willingness to correct their mistakes, willingness to help people get better at keeping the rules (willing to explain the rules broke), putting a reason for the verdict on the page, fairness, etc.
Nathan
Bebop
prayag
emily
JonSnow
Ripple
ErzaScarIet
sky
You can also give feedback to why you dock them or score them high and explain your grading system.
Please limit discussions here and just focus on grades, and put one post with the grades, so its easier to keep track of them
I think anyone willing to do 100+ reports a week is a pretty good mod. Bad mods used to be ones who cheated while being a mod, let banned users on their accounts, or did little to no reports and were always OTd. Even the mods who forum suspended people because they didn't like them weren't really seen as bad mods. The standard for what a mod needs to be for a free mafia site astounds me
deletedabout 7 years
a lot of ppl who dislike charley are salty banned users.
not...
speaking...
from...
experience...
.
.
.
deletedabout 7 years
and now you are resorting to personal attacks because u are too lazy to give an actual answer BOOOOOO
so removing a complaint thread about someone dubs him as the worst mod. meh, convincing. how do you mess 'mod abuser' with 'worst mod' together?
deletedabout 7 years
That thread contained pages and pages of people voicing their complaints about expose, admin responses to the situation and back and forth between them. not to mention tons of boss baby pics it was a valuable thread