the family idea that communist oppose is that of woman's subjugation to men, and the complete subjugation of the child to their parents, as in the kids has the right to wear what he wants or cut his hair the way he wants or listern to the music he wants. the whole communists wants 5 dads all fcking each other in free love is bullcrap
Can you quote thing he said that proves this. Also children need guidance, they can't understand how society or culture expectations works or morality on their own.
the family idea that communist oppose is that of woman's subjugation to men, and the complete subjugation of the child to their parents, as in the kids has the right to wear what he wants or cut his hair the way he wants or listern to the music he wants. the whole communists wants 5 dads all fcking each other in free love is bullcrap
Give me a good reason why breaking up the class of the family is good.
i will only say we should abolish all forms of hierarchy since they r inherently tools of oppression
There is so much proof that a standard 2 parent household is the healthiest thing for a child. The degradation of the family after welfare in the black communities is the perfect example of this.
morales r what the young hegelians called spooks, marx said u cant just think about urself and distanece urself from whats around u, the job of the philosopher is not just to analyze things but to take action. and the whole u cant just tell ppl that religion is bullsh't, u need to help those ppl, crystalized in the idea of hungry men dont create history, so u need to secure bread and help ppl in material way, cause im a material philosopher, living in a material world
u cant prosecute the winners of a war, thats why the chinese communists werent prosecuted, or the british, or the french or the americans, but to not prosecute the losers, japan, after what they did in china to protect japan from going left its inhumane and morally appalling
Instead of getting nuked they'd just get starved to death by russia, they were good at that. If you are going to believe a narrative I think it'd be better to believer your own countries. But maybe that's just me in believing everything is propaganda.
I'm citing historical facts and the guy who is your source called Hoover Ball the next great American sport, the baseball killer.
The defense rests.
Yes your sources of pro russian/communist are good sources. Stalin never intended to keep his promises but go ahead and believe that the guy who starved his own people and sent them to the gulags was a reliable leader.
and never forget that the us forgave all war crimes perpetraded by japan, imperials r*pd china and got away with it because of us protection
The same way we let the communists china overthrow the nationalist and accused them of trying to start a global war and put sanctions on them.
execpt they already had sent letters saying they wanted to surrender b4 the nuke?
In the interest of historical accuracy they wanted to surrender and keep their military junta/imperial dictatorship in those letters which was never going to happen.
But we definitely didn't have to nuke them, because Stalin would have thrown millions of bodies at them and beat them a day. They were hardly still a military at that point, doing stupid crap like tying firebombs to balloons and hoping the wind took them to the US (They sent about 5000. About 40 arrived. No casualties)
and never forget that the us forgave all war crimes perpetraded by japan, imperials r*pd china and got away with it because of us protection
deletedalmost 8 years
Instead of getting nuked they'd just get starved to death by russia, they were good at that. If you are going to believe a narrative I think it'd be better to believer your own countries. But maybe that's just me in believing everything is propaganda.
I'm citing historical facts and the guy who is your source called Hoover Ball the next great American sport, the baseball killer.