I'm not really sure why you're lying considering I never said any of those things.
deletedover 9 years
crayray deserves OGI. Minie maybe just a warning to not tell people to stop n1ing them outside of the games when she is running.
giving false/uninformed information to support a bad decision= biased. Mods should read all sides and read the actual game and think critically. Like everyone of you say that crayray forced nl, but you neglect to see it was an obvious accident caused by both mafia. You also mis-say that she did not kill a clear, but she did....
I wasn't arguing that everyone was biased until proven otherwise at all. The point that I am trying to make is whether or not you get involved in a situation has nothing to do with whether or not you are biased. Your biases (or lack thereof) are independent of whether or not you moderate a case. Choosing not to moderate a case or stay out of a situation doesn't make you unbiased or biased. It just means that your bias in either direction or lack thereof will not affect the outcome in any way.
deletedover 9 years
You make a lot of wrongful assertions with zero evidence, which is pretty hypocritical for someone claiming that others are biased and read zero games. It looks like you're the one who needs to do some fact checking.
By having a predetermined outlook on the guilt of the party before reviewing the available evidence.
This never happened.
Then that's probably better evidence that you didn't have a bias than the fact that you weren't involved with the investigation.
Exactly. She's just bitter because I told her I wasn't going to waste time on an appeal thread she posted to OT Minie's violation from OGI to NV. Last I checked, "not getting involved" is the opposite of biased.
She even agreed with the OGI verdict herself.
Semantics. Being fair is the opposite of being biased. "Not getting involved" doesn't change your bias. It just makes the bias irrelevant to the situation. If you were biased, "Not getting involved" is the best thing you could have done. So not sure what the problem is.
I don't think that I agree with that premise. "Biased until proven unbiased".
It's rather silly to run around waving the *everyone-is-biased flag* when those people take no action to exercise, what you suggest, presumed bias.
mt01's idea is the following:
Minie deserves a NV = unbiased Minie deserves OGI = biased Take no action to OT Minie's OGI vio to NV = biased
By having a predetermined outlook on the guilt of the party before reviewing the available evidence.
This never happened.
Then that's probably better evidence that you didn't have a bias than the fact that you weren't involved with the investigation.
Exactly. She's just bitter because I told her I wasn't going to waste time on an appeal thread she posted to OT Minie's violation from OGI to NV. Last I checked, "not getting involved" is the opposite of biased.
She even agreed with the OGI verdict herself.
Semantics. Being fair is the opposite of being biased. "Not getting involved" doesn't change your bias. It just makes the bias irrelevant to the situation. If you were biased, "Not getting involved" is the best thing you could have done. So not sure what the problem is.
You make a lot of wrongful assertions with zero evidence, which is pretty hypocritical for someone claiming that others are biased and read zero games. It looks like you're the one who needs to do some fact checking.
deletedover 9 years
By having a predetermined outlook on the guilt of the party before reviewing the available evidence.
This never happened.
Then that's probably better evidence that you didn't have a bias than the fact that you weren't involved with the investigation.
Exactly. She's just bitter because I told her I wasn't going to waste time on an appeal thread she posted to OT Minie's violation from OGI to NV. Last I checked, "not getting involved" is the opposite of biased.
She even agreed with the OGI verdict herself.
You deleted all your messages so I cant go back to them. You did misquote things like cray tried to force a nl, which is not really true if you look at the game. You cant say that you support their verdict cause cray did x,y,z when you did not read the games
By having a predetermined outlook on the guilt of the party before reviewing the available evidence.
This never happened.
Then that's probably better evidence that you didn't have a bias than the fact that you weren't involved with the investigation.
Exactly. She's just bitter because I told her I wasn't going to waste time on an appeal thread she posted to OT Minie's violation from OGI to NV. Last I checked, "not getting involved" is the opposite of biased.
She even agreed with the OGI verdict herself.
deletedover 9 years
The people on this poll are like the majority of the mods I like, I say delete this thread, or change it to which mod is the best
Pony i love you. you are sweetheart. However these guys are leaders, and they should be held accountable for what they do. I do ask that if you vote for someone, that you give them some sort of constructive criticism, so that they might get something out of this
I get your first part, yeah they're leaders and should be acountable, the only ones who are bad at that are white and patry, but just remember, according to the admin, they hold their mods up to a standard, and I was told, I do not meet that standard, so whatever.
You do not meet the standard? wow you were probably the most fair of all the mods I have seen since i have been on here.
1/2 the current ones just circle jerk, abuse powers, not even read the reports yet the games, etc.
deletedover 9 years
deletedover 9 years
Is it bad that I think all these mods are doing an OK job and the ones that need to be fired are the admins
I agree with this. Several good mods like quit and I think for a reason tbh. God I think Shamu even tried to get themselves banned so they could not mod anymore....
The poor quality we see in the modding i think is a direct reflection on their leaders...
The people on this poll are like the majority of the mods I like, I say delete this thread, or change it to which mod is the best
Pony i love you. you are sweetheart. However these guys are leaders, and they should be held accountable for what they do. I do ask that if you vote for someone, that you give them some sort of constructive criticism, so that they might get something out of this
I get your first part, yeah they're leaders and should be acountable, the only ones who are bad at that are white and patry, but just remember, according to the admin, they hold their mods up to a standard, and I was told, I do not meet that standard, so whatever.