So, Please tell me, How my idea becoming a survivor to earn full points, is way worse than your idea to turn a third sided role into vigilante that wins way less points.
Why every time i play sandbox and lyncher loses his win con, they suicide?
you don't why stop it it already lost its primary wincon give it a break
1. Mafia can fake lyncher and then say they turned into survivor to win, or it just ads many layers of stretegy.
whats the difference between mafia claiming lyncher turned vivor and mafia claiming lyncher that just cant win anyway mafia can already claim lyncher why would claiming lynchvivor change anything
Because of the point difference.
To your first sentence :
So you are basically saying Assassin becomes vigilante who wins way less points?
Honestly, if survivor wins full points, people will just stay in game and continue playing , rather than suiciding because their target is gone.
lyncher exists
if you're proposing a change to all roles like this one including lyncher which already exists, i dont think a role that doesn't exist is the right avenue to take
I am not suggesting a change to all roles.
I am suggesting Lyncher to not be an useless role that once loses because it is impossible to win, to get a second chance of redemption.
This would work perfectly for your assassin too. Because Assassin will stop killing after his target is gone.
Honestly, if survivor wins full points, people will just stay in game and continue playing , rather than suiciding because their target is gone.
lyncher exists
if you're proposing a change to all roles like this one including lyncher which already exists, i dont think a role that doesn't exist is the right avenue to take
let's say assassin becomes survivor like you suggested
assassin FAILS win condition because someone else kills its target. becomes survivor. has ANOTHER win condition for full points
thus two separate full win conditions
that's what i was just saying
Yeah. But is it better to stay with town and win for less points by only siding with them? Another suggestion is Surivor to always win less points.
so you want someone who rolls survivor (remember survivor is a role) to not be rewarded for surviving?
No ?
I want survivor to win full points for surviving LOL. But lyncher should get a second chance , since his first win condition is gone. AKA he can't win and winning with town for less points is not really appealing.
As I said before, good role but the person the assassin targets needs to be notified he has an assassin on him or it will be completely broken if they are detective roles (1/3 of all role population)