because you cant define someones entire worth based on a single disorder???
deletedover 7 years
I got a big ole donkey dįck
deletedover 7 years
how is more mental stability never better??? unless ur being abused or being used for sex trafficking in which case, yes, it'd be better to be completely insane
i was having a different argument when i typed that
deletedover 7 years
i don't know how autistic people feel about having autism, maybe they view it as just a part of who they are or maybe they feel the same and it sounds really hard to deal with or maybe both
how is more mental stability never better??? unless ur being abused or being used for sex trafficking in which case, yes, it'd be better to be completely insane
lmao elephantasm poser thought you were someone else
deletedover 7 years
based on facts; unbiased: an objective opinion. 6. intent upon or dealing with things external to the mind rather than with thoughts or feelings, as a person or a book.
o b j e ctivity is impossibly to apply there. It's also objectively true that an individual cannot be known by one trait.
I mean, let's be real here. There's some value in autistic tendencies. Spergs can use that as a strength in some cases that they wouldn't have if they were free and clear of the disorder.
Full blown autism on the other hand is almost never an advantage over the aspergers.
being less disordered is 100% the better thing, in terms of how people are, that varies in everyone and it always will lmao
deletedover 7 years
clearly i misinterpreted your initial statement because i took the thing i just quoted from arcbell to be "people with aspergers are objectively better than people with autism" aka giving values to individuals' quality as people
based on facts; unbiased: an objective opinion. 6. intent upon or dealing with things external to the mind rather than with thoughts or feelings, as a person or a book.