Epicmafia

Symphony

over 7 years

is ineligible to trophy.

The rule: Do not moderate competitive reports or rule on refunds if you are over 1k points

EdarkOct 12, 2016!+11 The rule has been changed a long time ago to that you cant do comp reports after you've passed 1000 points due to the fact that you might not know untill then if you actually have shot for a trophy. I cant really find this rule written down somehwere tho but I could fix that.

https://epicmafia.com/post/2728530/goto_page

https://epicmafia.com/post/2728548/goto_page

Considering Edark is still the admin and one of his mods broke this trophy running rule:

Charley doing comp reports after passing 1K round score on 2 accounts (Symphony + charley):

Prediction: Edark will ignore his own rule that he wrote up and allow his mod friend to trophy.

mandevian

over 7 years

charley says

Yes do you think i shouldn't?

I thought you were unlike others and actually respected the rules.

deletedover 7 years

Yes do you think i shouldn't?

mandevian

over 7 years

charley says

mandevian says

charley says

Whitepimp007 says

Pranay, TL;DR.

same

Look at the mod's response. Fit to argue about this, but new when the rule is to be applied.

my actual response was what nathan said i dont think i needed to say much more, i made a mistake.

charley says

mandevian says

charley says

Whitepimp007 says

Pranay, TL;DR.

same

Look at the mod's response. Fit to argue about this, but new when the rule is to be applied.

my actual response was what nathan said i dont think i needed to say much more, i made a mistake.

So do you think you should be allowed to get the trophy?

deletedover 7 years

Whitepimp007 says

Sorry, you quoted Pranay and I had to modneg that.

i understand

Whitepimp007

over 7 years

Sorry, you quoted Pranay and I had to modneg that.

deletedover 7 years

mandevian says

charley says

Whitepimp007 says

Pranay, TL;DR.

same

Look at the mod's response. Fit to argue about this, but new when the rule is to be applied.

my actual response was what nathan said i dont think i needed to say much more, i made a mistake.

deletedover 7 years

praynay = cheater

mandevian

over 7 years

charley says

Whitepimp007 says

Pranay, TL;DR.

same

Look at the mod's response. Fit to argue about this, but new when the rule is to be applied.

mandevian

over 7 years

Yeah, because rules mean nothing to you guys. You only worry about whether your friend gets their candy.

Nathan doesnt deserve to be admin.

At first people were not allowed to run if they modded gold heart games.

Then when gerry broke the rule, they changed the rule to the 1k points thing

Now when symphony broke the rule, they are saying she is new and thus should be allowed. Another change in the rule. This also implies that the mod team doesnt share the rules with mods. This rule is literally there in the mod forums.

We can all see how every rule is twisted to suit the mods.

deletedover 7 years

LOL!

Whitepimp007

over 7 years

I quoted you so I could modneg that again.

Whitepimp007

over 7 years

mandevian says

Nathan says

But yeah. Being new, charley forgot about this rule and once she realised she immediately let us know. I did skim over the reports she did do and I didn't see any bias in them so I let them be whilst warning her not to do a similar thing in the future. Plus, whatever Sonse said above. : )

That doesn't negate the fact that she is ineligible. Just remove the rule altogether or make another change that they are allowed if there is no bias.

Why is the rule even there? If you say there was no bias, and will thus allow it, it implies that you assume that mods have bias most of the time while doing reports?

Also she is not new. Also why didn't any mod tell her the rules before modding her?

Charley will take this in a negative way.

deletedover 7 years

Whitepimp007 says

Pranay, TL;DR.

same

Whitepimp007

over 7 years

Pranay, TL;DR.

mandevian

over 7 years

Nathan says

But yeah. Being new, charley forgot about this rule and once she realised she immediately let us know. I did skim over the reports she did do and I didn't see any bias in them so I let them be whilst warning her not to do a similar thing in the future. Plus, whatever Sonse said above. : )

That doesn't negate the fact that she is ineligible. Just remove the rule altogether or make another change that they are allowed if there is no bias.

Why is the rule even there? If you say there was no bias, and will thus allow it, it implies that you assume that mods have bias most of the time while doing reports?

Also she is not new. Also why didn't any mod tell her the rules before modding her?

Charley will take this in a negative way.

BSelser

over 7 years

The wrath of Recidivism

deletedover 7 years

Nathan, I'd like a respectable answer to my question in the mentor/mentee thread

deletedover 7 years

SYMPHONY YOUR FIRST COMPLAINT THREAD!

Arcbell

over 7 years

Podrick abc ban ban abc ban Podrick abc ban

deletedover 7 years

Podrick says

Don't shoot the messenger.

You bring the crowns and heads of conquered kings to my city steps. You insult my queen. You threaten my people with slavery and death! Oh, I've chosen my words carefully, Podrick. Perhaps you should have done the same.

Arcbell

over 7 years

Podrick abc

Podrick

over 7 years

Don't shoot the messenger.

deletedover 7 years

harodihg says

jinkies!

u rang

deletedover 7 years

Basically what nathan said ^

Nathan

over 7 years

But yeah. Being new, charley forgot about this rule and once she realised she immediately let us know. I did skim over the reports she did do and I didn't see any bias in them so I let them be whilst warning her not to do a similar thing in the future. Plus, whatever Sonse said above. : )