The rule:
Do not moderate competitive reports or rule on refunds if you are over 1k points
EdarkOct 12, 2016!+11
The rule has been changed a long time ago to that you cant do comp reports after you've passed 1000 points due to the fact that you might not know untill then if you actually have shot for a trophy. I cant really find this rule written down somehwere tho but I could fix that.
Yeah, because rules mean nothing to you guys. You only worry about whether your friend gets their candy.
Nathan doesnt deserve to be admin.
At first people were not allowed to run if they modded gold heart games.
Then when gerry broke the rule, they changed the rule to the 1k points thing
Now when symphony broke the rule, they are saying she is new and thus should be allowed. Another change in the rule. This also implies that the mod team doesnt share the rules with mods. This rule is literally there in the mod forums.
We can all see how every rule is twisted to suit the mods.
But yeah. Being new, charley forgot about this rule and once she realised she immediately let us know. I did skim over the reports she did do and I didn't see any bias in them so I let them be whilst warning her not to do a similar thing in the future. Plus, whatever Sonse said above. : )
That doesn't negate the fact that she is ineligible. Just remove the rule altogether or make another change that they are allowed if there is no bias.
Why is the rule even there? If you say there was no bias, and will thus allow it, it implies that you assume that mods have bias most of the time while doing reports?
Also she is not new. Also why didn't any mod tell her the rules before modding her?
But yeah. Being new, charley forgot about this rule and once she realised she immediately let us know. I did skim over the reports she did do and I didn't see any bias in them so I let them be whilst warning her not to do a similar thing in the future. Plus, whatever Sonse said above. : )
That doesn't negate the fact that she is ineligible. Just remove the rule altogether or make another change that they are allowed if there is no bias.
Why is the rule even there? If you say there was no bias, and will thus allow it, it implies that you assume that mods have bias most of the time while doing reports?
Also she is not new. Also why didn't any mod tell her the rules before modding her?
You bring the crowns and heads of conquered kings to my city steps. You insult my queen. You threaten my people with slavery and death! Oh, I've chosen my words carefully, Podrick. Perhaps you should have done the same.
But yeah. Being new, charley forgot about this rule and once she realised she immediately let us know. I did skim over the reports she did do and I didn't see any bias in them so I let them be whilst warning her not to do a similar thing in the future. Plus, whatever Sonse said above. : )