No. I wouldn't. But if I ever pick a fight or enrage a group. I'd make sure the group isnt more than 2. There is a theory that even if you are the fastest, you can't outrun 3 people.
deletedalmost 8 years
Oh oops wrong account ! Ok , Hun , erzascariet (erza) , Gerry , edark
Btw, commenting on the story with vilden. I'd be the last person to take such a risk. I don't like to be beaten up by co campers. I'd take a risk if there were 2 against me. Not with more than 2. No matter what leverage I have. I don't even want a scratch on my nail for no reason.
The thing is that when I go camping, I make the story. I dictate. Even when I go on outings with family, I do certain small things that influence all the major decisions. Including things like whether one of my cousins will play a certain game or not. I can give examples if you fancy, but I think you get the picture.
However, if I had to go camping with em people, I'd pick brown, atikur, Connor, and kerry. These are the people with whom I think I can tolerate a story that isnt under my control.
Vancy proposes a solution: they keep both of them in there, and go out searching for the real Robert or Rose. Whichever one they find, they will kill the imposter. There is one flare gun and one handgun. The handgun is emptied by Hedger and given only one bullet. Rose is given this gun, while Robert is given the flare gun. They have to point them at each other until the party gets back and figures out who's real.
Eventually, Vancy, Sharon, and Hedger go out looking for their stranded friend.
Meanwhile, Rose and Arcbell lower their guns. "Finally, we've got the place to ourselves ;D"
