BTW, You may see those photos, and the full feature article of WaPo in the following video, or find the full feature article on the web (hard to do, because the WaPo took it down after its initial release... huh, I wonder who forced that decision?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4OP--ZXOjc&t=0s
So, first of all, you are partly right. Some of the paintings listed as being in Podesta's house are not actually there. However, in the full feature article, you can see work by that same artist that is shown in the 'collage'. The ones in the collage are showing the other work of the artist (slight misinformation, agreed), but the ones in Tony Podesta's house are quite disturbing as well: one includes two dead asian girls in a pond; one features bonded girls in an empty swimming pool, in a circle... ; another features a girl who looks like she is dead and strangled.
Yeah, clearly a hoax. Why don't you go about disproving the other stuff, too?
How about the dead-on Madeleine McCann kidnappers' likeness to the Podestas? And the fact that they were literally BLOCKS away from McCann's house on the day of the kidnapping?
How far will you dig before you give up and accept the easier-to-digest narrative?
Sure, there's probably some facts mixed in there, but the author of the collage has been making up his own facts as well, which means you probably shouldn't sheep their sentiments based on some recurring symbols.
The author claims a bunch of artwork is in Tony Podesta's house. Why does the author know what artwork is in Tony Podesta's house? He doesn't, he's just posting random art he found on google and claiming it's in Tony's house.
Claiming something is "connected to the Clintons" is a meaningless statement and implies the author does not have any actual connection to show.
Everyone deserves their day in court, so let's take a look at ORLY's thingy
Yes, yes it is.
Having done exactly zero research into the facts presented in this .. let's keep calling it a collage.. I can tell you it's blatantly a hoax, and give you reasons:
Brother Sonseray, you are wrong to denounce brother Vash, though I understand your skepticism. Consider seriously the wisdom and truth that lies before you.
your news source isnt refuting the evidence ive offered, and you continue to ad hominem as well as simply put labels on things you dislike the presentation of. you dont know what to call the content, since you refuse to consider it, probably on account of the fact that you've been told not to consider it.
hmm, how progressive of you.
deletedalmost 8 years
You say citizen led investigation like that is a good thing. I don't want monkeys training my monkeys.
deletedalmost 8 years
Well you see I did research things myself, using an unaffiliated academic database that serves as a news aggregation.
You posted a collage that looks like what you might see before someone pitches you a pyramid scam.
How, exactly, do you think that you are the one who has researched things themselves?
it's pointless listening to you pontificate about your inability to bother researching things yourself.
this just goes to show you are not a mafia master, after all. but close. you'll get there someday, skipper.
deletedalmost 8 years
Maybe what you need is just a good slapping to knock you back into reality. I'm here to help.
deletedalmost 8 years
Hmmmm, where is this mountain of evidence? I can't find your kindergarten collage in my academic database, but I'll go check my local kindergarten and see if it turns up.
deletedalmost 8 years
You know what is disappointing? The fact that you are stupid enough to be duped by a bunch of pictures taken out of context and arranged in a pretty collage that makes you feel smart
when the crux of your attempt at disproving a mountain of evidence is a strawman about some random dude causing a ruckus in one of the affiliated locations, then you might be listening to fake news
