I'm surprised people haven't talked about this already (or did but got silenced by some sjws or whatever).
I really want to know what is your people's stance on circumcision? Here we will not be discussing cases where it is inevitable like phimosis. What we will be talking about is circumcision done to baby males or females (but mostly males obviously) and whether religious ceremonies like Brit milah should be legal.
true, i may have used the wrong word, but having to go through this surgery as a kid or teen could actually affect you vividly. not really sure how to explain it. im sure if we go with the technical definitions you are right but you know what i mean.
deletedover 8 years
correct
i look at other men's dongs and go "boy do i wish you had foreskin"
I mean it doesn't affect you in any way apart from those few seconds when its done? It doesn't have an impact on your life. You don't look down at your click and tell yourself "boy do i wish i had foreskin!"
its more traumatizing to perform circumcision on an infant because you cant use strong anesthesia without potentially killing the baby. so that coupled with the shock of mutilation on a newly forming brain does cause trauma whether you have vivid photographic memory of it or not, trauma isnt just bad memories
i think there were some studies suggesting men who were circumcised as infants are more sexually and physically aggressive but i cant be assed to write a sourced essay on an obviously bad double standard
as for hygiene thats why we invented the shower
deletedover 8 years
i used a corn husking machine to perform my adult circumcision
indeed. but sometimes there are medical reasons to do it, like it was in my case. I had phimosis, for example (warning: shocking pics in google images). and if your family has a history of phimosis or something else, it is better to do it as a baby than as an adult or teen since it'll make the recovery time better.
doing it for religious motives is debatable. i think most religions have bigger issues to talk about than wheter or not they take off 2 centimeters of skin out of a baby.
doing it or not doing it is honestly irrelevant unless you have medical reasons to do it. im neither for or against it.
yes, circumcised makes it less sensible to stuff like cloths, but for everything else its the same.
as for the dryness, yes, i guess its slightly less dry but that only matters for the first minute or even less during sexual activities, its not really relevant, and def not a determinant reason to not do this.
but doesn't the foreskin protect the head's skin from getting too dry and also the nerve endings on it from having contact with stuff and getting numb?
