The party in question is (mostly) white -> Wrong The party in question is (mostly) in a minority -> Not wrong
The party is (mostly) men -> Wrong The party in question is (mostly) one of 61 other fake genders -> Not Wrong
The party is (mostly) men and (mostly) white -> Holy shi* spray some Agent Orange The party is (mostly) women and (mostly) in a minority -> Give them everything you got because they deserve it for having such a hard life
Is this sarcasm? I thought your other post was sarcasm, but this really sounds like sarcasm too. I mean, I just have to assume that whenever someone makes nasty generalizations about whole groups of people but generally has the brainpower to write proper sentences and use big words like "disgusting," they are being sarcastic, unless they spent their whole life just learning to be convincing so they can spread their stupidity at a faster rate, and I don't think the latter description matches you.
I mean, you're right about what we as a species are doing, and since it's totally unnecessary for survival at this point I'd consider lifelong torture and mass-murder wrong regardless of the mental capabilities of the victims, but the way you said it makes me think you're being sarcastic, because I'm assuming you, Satan, are intelligent enough to conclude on your own that neither democrats nor republicans are collectively particularly horrible or disgusting by the low standards of human beings, and that calling people disgusting because of conflicting viewpoints is almost as stupid as me typing up this longpost about whether you're being sarcastic in response to obvious sarcasm.
I am assuming you do not, in fact, have a view on the subject, and/or that you are mocking both of the aggressive extremes of the debate, rather than one over the other.
I'll let the homosexual parents be the judge of that.
deletedover 8 years
Even further i heavily support infanticide in the case it is a white male child is born. I'll give them to the age of six to decide if they are male or female though.
