Back to General Discussion

posted to be rated on positivity

deletedalmost 10 years

be rated on positivity but if i dont know you eh

NEGATIVE

lilin

roadman

groundhogday

Discordia

izzy

Cody

Sincerely

Zhourb

SimplyPam

Tatami

harod

Ariel

trolleyz

xSoniaNeverMindx

edark

Matt12

ChilledOut

POSITIVE

POSITIVE-NEGATIVE DICHOTOMY DOES NOT APPLY

Winx

Himiko

Should other's means be used for your means
13
Yes
6
No
deletedalmost 10 years

groundhogday says


lilin says


groundhogday says


lilin says

im reading lolita rn


humbert dies


honestly self delete tbqh


now you can get to good books, like the da vinci code


what are the themes
deletedalmost 10 years

groundhogday says


lilin says


groundhogday says


lilin says

im reading lolita rn


humbert dies


honestly self delete tbqh


now you can get to good books, like the da vinci code


Dan Brown's best is Angels and Demons
groundhogday
almost 10 years

lilin says


groundhogday says


lilin says

im reading lolita rn


humbert dies


honestly self delete tbqh


now you can get to good books, like the da vinci code
deletedalmost 10 years

groundhogday says


lilin says

im reading lolita rn


humbert dies


honestly self delete tbqh
deletedalmost 10 years
Sonia, as much as I really want to understand what you just said, I can't

Can you please reformat and retype that so I can comprehend the "2 cents" you're bringing
deletedalmost 10 years

groundhogday says


lilin says

im reading lolita rn


humbert dies


He's also an unreliable narrator
groundhogday
almost 10 years

lilin says

im reading lolita rn


humbert dies
xSoniaNeverMindx
almost 10 years


Is it basically recognizing people not as people, but as objects you could use to your own benefit?


If you don't mind me adding my own 2 cents to this as I enjoy talking on topics like this I think that everyone goes this just not to the extreme of "objects" but as in "if I do this for you I think you'll help me do this later" It's just life we depend on others to get by and that's fine I don't think ill intent is in mind when it comes to this
deletedalmost 10 years

lilin says

doesn't refute my argument/10


It kinda doesn't but at the same time the future is unknowable so choosing merely what's right for you and ignoring universally agreed upon maxims aka moral law which at least in the immediate sense serve everyone rather than one self is potentially worse rather than better in the long term.
deletedalmost 10 years
im reading lolita rn
deletedalmost 10 years
doesn't refute my argument/10
deletedalmost 10 years
I feel very honored to be leading the positive people

Discordia, do you believe acting against one's desires is the right thing to do? I am not asking if it is good or bad
deletedalmost 10 years
Human beings act in defiance of their own desires all the time though on the basis of moral law.
xSoniaNeverMindx
almost 10 years
I don't think you really know me but being put on a list is neat so!
deletedalmost 10 years
not being true to yourself only hurts you
deletedalmost 10 years
If everyone were to have the "Yes" mentality, we'd be in a world of kill-or-be-killed

What do I know, though? It might well already be kill-or-be-killed, and I am just on the good end so far
deletedalmost 10 years
My desire to maintain my image as a bastion of immorality tells me to click yes but this burning hot poker in my a$$ says to click no.
deletedalmost 10 years
I will respectfully select "No"
deletedalmost 10 years

groundhogday says


ChilledOut says

I am not very philosophical (but I am actually reading a book of Philosophy right now for fun, since I am interested in it) so I don't quite understand yet.

Is it basically recognizing people not as people, but as objects you could use to your own benefit?


think of it more as not pulling out


LMAO IAN
deletedalmost 10 years

ChilledOut says

I am not very philosophical (but I am actually reading a book of Philosophy right now for fun, since I am interested in it) so I don't quite understand yet.

Is it basically recognizing people not as people, but as objects you could use to your own benefit?


Yeh basically.
groundhogday
almost 10 years

ChilledOut says

I am not very philosophical (but I am actually reading a book of Philosophy right now for fun, since I am interested in it) so I don't quite understand yet.

Is it basically recognizing people not as people, but as objects you could use to your own benefit?


think of it more as not pulling out
groundhogday
almost 10 years
can you tell me what dfw means first
deletedalmost 10 years
I am not very philosophical (but I am actually reading a book of Philosophy right now for fun, since I am interested in it) so I don't quite understand yet.

Is it basically recognizing people not as people, but as objects you could use to your own benefit?
deletedalmost 10 years
if you want to
groundhogday
almost 10 years
lilin can i put you in my post to be ranked on how likely you are to do great things in your lifetime thread