To be fair, he's from Ireland. Spastic is associated with 'spasticated', which basically means mentally ret*rded. He knows what he's saying, and the fact that he said it time and time again shows that he was being excessive.
Also @ the cover story thing. I'm p sure he would have said like, 'MrROB is handicapped' or even 'MrROB is challenged', or maybe thrown a 'mentally' in there for good measure if he had intent to offend in that manner.
deletedover 8 years
when is connor not mad
deletedover 8 years
he meant the persons he called a spaz were spazzing out on their keyboards and were voting too quickly
No he didn't. He used that word because he can't say r----d. He couldn't use a hateful word so he used... a synonym of a hateful word instead to describe the players in his game as disabled EIGHT times.
I don't appreciate a lot of things from you, but you still do those things anyway. I dunno what your point is.
"i don't like how you criticise my admin decisions, so i'm allowed to support posts that imply you have downs syndrome (and also that it's a bad thing)"
like every week you guys add some new list of phrases to the HC list, even if you legi think spaz is a vio (lol) why not just give him a note or something, since i'm pretty sure that vio for spaz under lol logic took everyone by surprise
devante, it's clear he's using the term handicap much like handicapping a team, handicapping yourself, as in the verb/noun handicap and not to describe a handicapped person
however, f-tarded clearly means r-tarded and calling someone a f-tard for being dumb is clearly also hc... except these mods clearly don't think so
"MrROB is a f***ing handicap lol he votes NL instead of Marjorie"
As in, MrROB is a handicap to have on the team.
okay, although that's a good cover story and i give giga ratings for coming up with it on the fly, that's obviously not what he meant in the heat of the moment lmao
but let's go with that and remove boodler's vio with the same logic to spaz
he meant the persons he called a spaz were spazzing out on their keyboards and were voting too quickly
I personally think it'd be hilarious if Zovea instantly reappeared out of nowhere and reported you for this
lmao
deletedover 8 years
I originally did give him the violation for that very reason, because I thought the same as you did, but after discussing it with giga and others on the mod team I realized that apparently it is a common expression that I hadn't been exposed to. Connor, who reported it, said he didn't believe there was a connection either.
To be fair, I just re-read the game and not a single person rose to his insults once, nor did they ask him to stop. No one seemed upset or angry in-game, and in all honesty he probably only got reported because he mishammered. He did however excessively spew slurs out like every other sentence.
Exactly. Not harassment. Hateful comments, however, does not need to fall under those criteria. The criteria for a HC violation were met in that report.
okay, let's say this is true (lol)
how is this one a vio and giga's isn't?
He's explaining that it was playing with a handicap; having a team that were so awful in his eyes. Then he uses a word which he does not deem to be a slur. If he knew that the word was off-limits, he wouldn't have used it. There have been many cases where people have reported that word in particular in the past and not been given violations.
and i also just read the giga game for a double lol
giga literally said user x is a handicap, not user x's team was handicap with them on the team so idk how cody and whoever else came up with this Lakers theory or whatever lmao
To be fair, I just re-read the game and not a single person rose to his insults once, nor did they ask him to stop. No one seemed upset or angry in-game, and in all honesty he probably only got reported because he mishammered. He did however excessively spew slurs out like every other sentence.
Exactly. Not harassment. Hateful comments, however, does not need to fall under those criteria. The criteria for a HC violation were met in that report.
okay, let's say this is true (lol)
how is this one a vio and giga's isn't?
He's explaining that it was playing with a handicap; having a team that were so awful in his eyes. Then he uses a word which he does not deem to be a slur. If he knew that the word was off-limits, he wouldn't have used it. There have been many cases where people have reported that word in particular in the past and not been given violations.
deletedover 8 years
Then debunk my arguments rather than asking me to repeat them, because that is tedious.
i would explain why giga's is much more hateful comment than boodlers, but then that would just talk you guys into giving giga a violation which is the opposite of what i'm trying to accomplish
that was me late at night, trying to go to bed, now i've had 3 hours of sleep, 8 hour meeting & 1 hour at the gym so i'm ready to fully tackle this beast till i go out tonight
deletedover 8 years
He used the word in seven different lines, along with a (albeit self-censored) f------t.
Giga used a slur once.....Neither are considered slurs under the current rules but if used excessively they definitely warrant the violation.
No because its hateful language, not aimed at anyone in particular, but hateful nonetheless. HC doesn't have to be excessive but that certainly increases the chances of accumulating a violation.
He can't go around using the word s-----c as a buzzword, which he clearly is doing, and he has a history of hateful comments. Just like with Giga, who also has a history of HC, I took that into consideration as well.
With Giga, I thought there was a connection between using the word f-----d and handicap but I was corrected, as it is a sports term and I didn't realize that. Just the single use of the word, which we don't really consider a slur under precedent, I couldn't give him a violation.
I'd say that my response was adequate.
deletedover 8 years
To be fair, I just re-read the game and not a single person rose to his insults once, nor did they ask him to stop. No one seemed upset or angry in-game, and in all honesty he probably only got reported because he mishammered. He did however excessively spew slurs out like every other sentence.
Exactly. Not harassment. Hateful comments, however, does not need to fall under those criteria. The criteria for a HC violation were met in that report.
okay, let's say this is true (lol)
how is this one a vio and giga's isn't?
The explanation I gave on the very first page of this thread seemed to satisfy you?