36 hours per day, 12 hours per night. Days may end early if a majority lynch is reached.
II. The Setup:
Normal closed roles setup, as always, with the roles and affixes listed below. Any role can be town or mafia, and have any number of affixes.
By default there are no Night 1 actions, including the mafia kill.
By default no role can self visit, except watcher.
Players who share a meeting may communicate outside the game at any time of day.
Players are always notified at day start if their role is changed.
One mafia always leads the kill, and it's always the one that submits the kill last. Each mafia will visit the kill target.
On death, players flip their role, alignment and affix type by default, but not their affix details.
III. Supermajority Lynch Rules:
A lynch will happen immediately if a supermajority vote is reached (e.g. 9/16)
At end of day, "No votes" count as "no one" votes, but will not count towards a mid-day supermajority vote of "no one". The player with the most votes at that end of day, (including "no one") will be lynched.
Days can be ended early without a lynch by a supermajority "no one" vote.
i'm sorry i went on a bit of a tangent there. i cannot in good measure lynch someone who's given so much insight, and it would absolutely pain me if they flipped town on day 1. i do think they're mafia for the time being, but i just can't rn.
vote gerry
come on guys this lynch is a really decent d1 choice.
also Slick I think I asked you a similar thing: why is my questioning ONE PERSON about ONE THING such a reason to TR me? It's not like I'd be incapable of doing that as mafia, bad as I am at this fcking game.
hang on buster, of all votes on perish i'm surprised to see yours there, because you LITERALLY just got done saying you townread her push on you only to vote her 1 minute later. if you can properly justify this then i'll let it side otherwise i'll have to retract my townread on you for the umptillionth time. I want you to be town with me Slick, I really do.
Edit to Sins post: I had the tr on Stagger and I said why and that's trying to defuse a fight while she seemed really upset with soda I tr'd her getting upset with soda and wanting his answer on a read more then I do just a fight the fight is a added bonus
gladly. she's been fabricating all posts. no town makes such articulate posts every single time. i do not believe any of her reads or her justifications to her actions this game. Ex: I do not believe she was voting me to get "rxns". That was a hard tunnel on me and she was legitimately trying to get me lynched, not gauge reaction. I do not believe her tunnel on Slick for one second, that was absolutely feigned by every sense of the word. Need I say ****ing more?
I agree that her saying SirSlick's post was scum was ????? and I didn't vote with it because I disagreed. I also dislike that she has just totally been okay with unvoting both Soda and me and not pushing them again except in Soda's case because she got frustrated with his obnoxious strategy this game.
Claire, ANSWER MY NITPICKS, PLEASE. I was town before and I'm town again, and I shall nitpick if I think I have a chance of gleaning a decent scumread from the responses.
I'm sorry my posts are so cringeworthy; I'm horrified by them too.
but anyway, Transcend, can you EXPLAIN your own READ on PERISH beyond "omg she's so forced guis!!!!1one," and/or possibly explain why her read on you seems forged?
avoiding longpost so you can stand to actually read and maybe even reply to what I say.
but unfortunately this is probably gonna be a week of everyone blind trusting perish and her carrying her scum team to a cake walk victory since no one is even willing to discuss perish with me.
at this point i'd lynch sincerely too but it's a gamble since she's posted a bunch of novels lately and i cbf to read them because i hate reading her posts.
